Cited by 45Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Protein structure determination by exhaustive search of Protein Data Bank derived databases

Open access
Stokes-Rees, Ian, Sliz, Piotr·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Parallel sequence and structure alignment tools have become ubiquitous and invaluable at all levels in the study of biological systems. We demonstrate the application and utility of this same parallel search paradigm to the process of protein structure determination, benefitting from the large and growing corpus of known structures. Such searches were previously computationally intractable. Through the method of Wide Search Molecular Replacement, developed here, they can be completed in a few hours with the aide of national-scale federated cyberinfrastructure. By dramatically expanding the range of models considered for structure determination, we show that small (less than 12% structural coverage) and low sequence identity (less than 20% identity) template structures can be identified through multidimensional template scoring metrics and used for structure determination. Many new macromolecular complexes can benefit significantly from such a technique due to the lack of known homologous protein folds or sequences. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method by determining the structure of a full-length p97 homologue from Trichoplusia ni . Example cases with the MHC/T-cell receptor complex and the EmoB protein provide systematic estimates of minimum sequence identity, structure coverage, and structural similarity required for this method to succeed. We describe how this structure-search approach and other novel computationally intensive workflows are made tractable through integration with the US national computational cyberinfrastructure, allowing, for example, rapid processing of the entire Structural Classification of Proteins protein fragment database.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1012095107

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each KpnFepA contains >50% identity to EcoFepA, ensuring a similar protein fold.

    “However, each of them contains >50% identity to EcoFepA, ensuring a similar protein fold (25,26).”

    From Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition by <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results describe a related p97 example in which proteins have similar architecture, consistent with the general idea that related sequences can have similar structures. The paper does not discuss KpnFepA or EcoFepA, establish their >50% identity, or show that their folds are similar. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Hoppe W. Faltmolekülmethode. Acta Crystallogr. 1957;10:750–751. [Google Scholar]
  2. [25]Couvares P, Kosar T, Roy A, Weber J, Wegner K. Workflow in Condor. In: Taylor I, Deelman E, Gannon D, Shields M, editors. Workflows for e-Science. New York: Springer; 2007. pp. 357–375. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stokes-Rees, I., & Sliz, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-22
Volume
107
Issue
50
Pages
21476-21481
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1964889794
Cited by
45
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0639193)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Office of Science
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM062580)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein structure determination, molecular replacement, Protein Data Bank, macromolecular complexes, Trichoplusia ni, parallel computing, cyberinfrastructure
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review