Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation

Open access
Lee, Chul Won, Ferreon, Josephine C., Ferreon, Allan Chris M., Arai, Munehito, Wright, Peter E.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The transcriptional activity of p53 is regulated by a cascade of posttranslational modifications. Although acetylation of p53 by CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 is known to be indispensable for p53 activation, the role of phosphorylation, and in particular multisite phosphorylation, in activation of CBP/p300-dependent p53 transcriptional pathways remains unclear. We investigated the role of single site and multiple site phosphorylation of the p53 transactivation domain in mediating its interaction with CBP and with the ubiquitin ligase HDM2. Phosphorylation at Thr18 functions as an on/off switch to regulate binding to the N-terminal domain of HDM2. In contrast, binding to CBP is modulated by the extent of p53 phosphorylation; addition of successive phosphoryl groups enhances the affinity for the TAZ1, TAZ2, and KIX domains of CBP in an additive manner. Activation of p53-dependent transcriptional pathways requires that p53 compete with numerous cellular transcription factors for binding to limiting amounts of CBP/p300. Multisite phosphorylation represents a mechanism for a graded p53 response, with each successive phosphorylation event resulting in increasingly efficient recruitment of CBP/p300 to p53-regulated transcriptional programs, in the face of competition from cellular transcription factors. Multisite phosphorylation thus acts as a rheostat to enhance binding to CBP/p300 and provides a plausible mechanistic explanation for the gradually increasing p53 response observed following prolonged or severe genotoxic stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1013078107

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Lee, C. W., Ferreon, J. C., Ferreon, A. C. M., Arai, M., & Wright, P. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-10-20
Volume
107
Issue
45
Pages
19290-19295
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2128121763
Cited by
213
References
7
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1013078107
The paper
Lee, C. W., Ferreon, J. C., Ferreon, A. C. M., Arai, M., & Wright, P. E. (2010). Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013078107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.