The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation
Open accessAbstract
The transcriptional activity of p53 is regulated by a cascade of posttranslational modifications. Although acetylation of p53 by CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 is known to be indispensable for p53 activation, the role of phosphorylation, and in particular multisite phosphorylation, in activation of CBP/p300-dependent p53 transcriptional pathways remains unclear. We investigated the role of single site and multiple site phosphorylation of the p53 transactivation domain in mediating its interaction with CBP and with the ubiquitin ligase HDM2. Phosphorylation at Thr18 functions as an on/off switch to regulate binding to the N-terminal domain of HDM2. In contrast, binding to CBP is modulated by the extent of p53 phosphorylation; addition of successive phosphoryl groups enhances the affinity for the TAZ1, TAZ2, and KIX domains of CBP in an additive manner. Activation of p53-dependent transcriptional pathways requires that p53 compete with numerous cellular transcription factors for binding to limiting amounts of CBP/p300. Multisite phosphorylation represents a mechanism for a graded p53 response, with each successive phosphorylation event resulting in increasingly efficient recruitment of CBP/p300 to p53-regulated transcriptional programs, in the face of competition from cellular transcription factors. Multisite phosphorylation thus acts as a rheostat to enhance binding to CBP/p300 and provides a plausible mechanistic explanation for the gradually increasing p53 response observed following prolonged or severe genotoxic stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Phosphorylation of TAD has been shown to serve as a switch to rapidly turn p53 function on and off but also as a mechanism for a graded p53 response.276,277”
From Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [276]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Vousden, K. H., & Prives, C. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037 · Cited by 3,163
Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain
Kussie, P. H., Gorina, S., Marechal, V., Elenbaas, B., Moreau, J., Levine, A. J., & Pavletich, N. P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.948 · Cited by 2,206
CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development
Goodman, R. H., & Smolik, S. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.13.1553 · Cited by 1,778
Kruse, J.-P., & Gu, W. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.050 · Cited by 1,610 · cited 2×
“Although it is clear that p53 is activated by a complex cascade of phosphorylation and other posttranslational modifications initiated by genotoxic stress, the functional roles played by individual phosphorylation sites and by multisite phosphorylation events remain poorly understood (1, 2, 4, 12).”
BackgroundPost-translational modification of p53 in tumorigenesis
Bode, A. M., & Dong, Z. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1455 · Cited by 1,270
Transcriptional Cross Talk between NF-κB and p53
Webster, G. A., & Perkins, N. D. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.5.3485 · Cited by 598
Variable Control of Ets-1 DNA Binding by Multiple Phosphates in an Unstructured Region
Pufall, M. A., Lee, G. M., Nelson, M. L., Kang, H.-S., Velyvis, A., Kay, L. E., McIntosh, L. P., & Graves, B. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111915 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy
Wang, H., Guo, M., Wei, H., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01347-1 · Cited by 1,016
p53 modifications: exquisite decorations of the powerful guardian
Liu, Y., Tavana, O., & Gu, W. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjz060 · Cited by 392
Pathological Unfoldomics of Uncontrolled Chaos: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Human Diseases
Uversky, V. N., Davé, V., Iakoucheva, L. M., Malaney, P., Metallo, S. J., Pathak, R. R., & Joerger, A. C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400713r · Cited by 288
Gli Protein Activity Is Controlled by Multisite Phosphorylation in Vertebrate Hedgehog Signaling
Niewiadomski, P., Kong, J. H., Ahrends, R., Ma, Y., Humke, E. W., Khan, S., Teruel, M. N., Novitch, B. G., & Rohatgi, R. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.003 · Cited by 239
Deciphering the acetylation code of p53 in transcription regulation and tumor suppression
Xia, Z., Kon, N., Gu, A. P., Tavana, O., & Gu, W. (2022) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-022-02331-9 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C. W., Ferreon, J. C., Ferreon, A. C. M., Arai, M., & Wright, P. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-10-20
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 19290-19295
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2128121763
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1013078107
- The paper
- Lee, C. W., Ferreon, J. C., Ferreon, A. C. M., Arai, M., & Wright, P. E. (2010). Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013078107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.