Cited by 159Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsCancer Cells and Metastasis

Transcriptionally repressed genes become aberrantly methylated and distinguish tumors of different lineages in breast cancer

Open access
Sproul, Duncan, Nestor, Colm, Culley, Jayne, Dickson, Jacqueline H., Dixon, J. Michael, Harrison, David J., Meehan, Richard R., Sims, Andrew H. +1 more·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Aberrant promoter hypermethylation is frequently observed in cancer. The potential for this mechanism to contribute to tumor development depends on whether the genes affected are repressed because of their methylation. Many aberrantly methylated genes play important roles in development and are bivalently marked in ES cells, suggesting that their aberrant methylation may reflect developmental processes. We investigated this possibility by analyzing promoter methylation in 19 breast cancer cell lines and 47 primary breast tumors. In cell lines, we defined 120 genes that were significantly repressed in association with methylation (SRAM). These genes allowed the unsupervised segregation of cell lines into epithelial (EPCAM+ve) and mesenchymal (EPCAM−ve) lineages. However, the methylated genes were already repressed in normal cells of the same lineage, and >90% could not be derepressed by treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. The tumor suppressor genes APC and CDH1 were among those methylated in a lineage-specific fashion. As predicted by the epithelial nature of most breast tumors, SRAM genes that were methylated in epithelial cell lines were frequently aberrantly methylated in primary tumors, as were genes specifically repressed in normal epithelial cells. An SRAM gene expression signature also correctly identified the rare claudin-low and metaplastic tumors as having mesenchymal characteristics. Our findings implicate aberrant DNA methylation as a marker of cell lineage rather than tumor progression and suggest that, in most cases, it does not cause the repression with which it is associated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1013224108

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sproul, D., Nestor, C., Culley, J., Dickson, J. H., Dixon, J. M., Harrison, D. J., Meehan, R. R., Sims, A. H., & Ramsahoye, B. H.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB)
  • MRC Human Genetics Unit (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
  • Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-02-28
Volume
108
Issue
11
Pages
4364-4369
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2014432992
Cited by
159
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
aberrant DNA methylation, promoter hypermethylation, transcriptional repression, breast cancer, cell lineage, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metaplastic breast carcinoma, tumor suppressor, APC, CDH1, decitabine, gene expression signatures, breast cancer cell lines
MeSH terms
Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Epithelial Cells, Female, Histones, Humans, Mesoderm, Organ Specificity, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, CpG Islands, Cell Lineage, DNA Methylation, Cell Line, Tumor, Genes, Neoplasm, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review