Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development
Open accessAbstract
Biological shapes are often produced by the iterative generation of repeated units. The mechanistic basis of such iteration is an area of intense investigation. Leaf development in the model plant Arabidopsis is one such example where the repeated generation of leaf margin protrusions, termed serrations, is a key feature of final shape. However, the regulatory logic underlying this process is unclear. Here, we use a combination of developmental genetics and computational modeling to show that serration development is the morphological read-out of a spatially distributed regulatory mechanism, which creates interspersed activity peaks of the growth-promoting hormone auxin and the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON2 (CUC2) transcription factor. This mechanism operates at the growing leaf margin via a regulatory module consisting of two feedback loops working in concert. The first loop relates the transport of auxin to its own distribution, via polar membrane localization of the PINFORMED1 (PIN1) efflux transporter. This loop captures the potential of auxin to generate self-organizing patterns in diverse developmental contexts. In the second loop, CUC2 promotes the generation of PIN1-dependent auxin activity maxima while auxin represses CUC2 expression. This CUC2-dependent loop regulates activity of the conserved auxin efflux module in leaf margins to generate stable serration patterns. Conceptualizing leaf margin development via this mechanism also helps to explain how other developmental regulators influence leaf shape.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CUC2 promotes the formation of auxin maxima through its action on PIN1 re-orientation and in return auxin downregulates CUC2 expression, forming a robust feedback loop.
“CUC2 promotes the formation of auxin maxima through its action on PIN1 re-orientation and in return auxin downregulates CUC2 expression, forming a robust feedback loop (Bilsborough et al., 2011).”
From <i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems (2016) · cites this paper as Bilsborough et al., 2011
In Arabidopsis, a sequence of interspersed auxin maxima and CUC2 expression domains pre-pattern the leaf margin.
“In Arabidopsis, a combination of genetic approaches and computer modeling suggested that a sequence of interspersed auxin maxima and CUC2 expression domains pre-pattern the leaf margin (Bilsborough et al., 2011).”
From <i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems (2016) · cites this paper as Bilsborough et al., 2011
Cites
The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves
Berger, Y., Harpaz-Saad, S., Brand, A., Melnik, H., Sirding, N., Alvarez, J. P., Zinder, M., Samach, A., Eshed, Y., & Ori, N. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.031625 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Furutani, M., Vernoux, T., Traas, J., Kato, T., Tasaka, M., & Aida, M. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01388 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How boundaries control plant development
Žádníková, P., & Simon, R. (2014) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.11.013 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
<i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems
Wang, Q., Hasson, A., Rossmann, S., & Theres, K. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13641 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bilsborough, G. D., Runions, A., Barkoulas, M., Jenkins, H. W., Hasson, A., Galinha, C., Laufs, P., Hay, A., Prusinkiewicz, P., & Tsiantis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4; and
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-02-07
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3424-3429
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3044365
- OpenAlex
- W1969591602
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 35.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G0023905/1, BB/H006974/1, BB/F012934/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Keywords
- auxin transport, feedback loops, self-organization, leaf shape, Arabidopsis thaliana, computational modeling of development
- MeSH terms
- Biofeedback, Psychology, Biological Transport, Indoleacetic Acids, Models, Biological, Plant Growth Regulators, Arabidopsis, Plant Leaves, Body Patterning, Arabidopsis Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review