Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

c-Met signaling induces a reprogramming network and supports the glioblastoma stem-like phenotype

Open access
Li, Yunqing, Li, Angela, Glas, Martin, Lal, Bachchu, Ying, Mingyao, Sang, Yingying, Xia, Shuli, Trageser, Daniel, Guerrero-Cázares, Hugo, Eberhart, Charles G., Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alfredo, Scheffler, Bjorn, Laterra, John·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The tyrosine kinase c-Met promotes the formation and malignant progression of multiple cancers. It is well known that c-Met hyperactivation increases tumorigenicity and tumor cell resistance to DNA damaging agents, properties associated with tumor-initiating stem cells. However, a link between c-Met signaling and the formation and/or maintenance of neoplastic stem cells has not been previously identified. Here, we show that c-Met is activated and functional in glioblastoma (GBM) neurospheres enriched for glioblastoma tumor-initiating stem cells and that c-Met expression/function correlates with stem cell marker expression and the neoplastic stem cell phenotype in glioblastoma neurospheres and clinical glioblastoma specimens. c-Met activation was found to induce the expression of reprogramming transcription factors (RFs) known to support embryonic stem cells and induce differentiated cells to form pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, and c-Met activation counteracted the effects of forced differentiation in glioblastoma neurospheres. Expression of the reprogramming transcription factor Nanog by glioblastoma cells is shown to mediate the ability of c-Met to induce the stem cell characteristics of neurosphere formation and neurosphere cell self-renewal. These findings show that c-Met enhances the population of glioblastoma stem cells (GBM SCs) via a mechanism requiring Nanog and potentially other c-Met–responsive reprogramming transcription factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1016912108

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y., Li, A., Glas, M., Lal, B., Ying, M., Sang, Y., Xia, S., Trageser, D., Guerrero-Cázares, H., Eberhart, C. G., Quiñones-Hinojosa, A., Scheffler, B., & Laterra, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-05-31
Volume
108
Issue
24
Pages
9951-9956
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1992301683
Cited by
266
References
33
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: c-Met signaling induces a reprogramming network and supports the glioblastoma stem-like phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1016912108
The paper
Li, Y., Li, A., Glas, M., Lal, B., Ying, M., Sang, Y., Xia, S., Trageser, D., Guerrero-Cázares, H., Eberhart, C. G., Quiñones-Hinojosa, A., Scheffler, B., & Laterra, J. (2011). c-Met signaling induces a reprogramming network and supports the glioblastoma stem-like phenotype. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016912108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.