The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping allostery through the covariance analysis of NMR chemical shifts
Open accessAbstract
Allostery is a fundamental mechanism of regulation in biology. The residues at the end points of long-range allosteric perturbations are commonly identified by the comparative analyses of structures and dynamics in apo and effector-bound states. However, the networks of interactions mediating the propagation of allosteric signals between the end points often remain elusive. Here we show that the covariance analysis of NMR chemical shift changes caused by a set of covalently modified analogs of the allosteric effector (i.e., agonists and antagonists) reveals extended networks of coupled residues. Unexpectedly, such networks reach not only sites subject to effector-dependent structural variations, but also regions that are controlled by dynamically driven allostery. In these regions the allosteric signal is propagated mainly by dynamic rather than structural modulations, which result in subtle but highly correlated chemical shift variations. The proposed chemical shift covariance analysis (CHESCA) identifies interresidue correlations based on the combination of agglomerative clustering (AC) and singular value decomposition (SVD). AC results in dendrograms that define functional clusters of coupled residues, while SVD generates score plots that provide a residue-specific dissection of the contributions to binding and allostery. The CHESCA approach was validated by applying it to the cAMP-binding domain of the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC) and the CHESCA results are in full agreement with independent mutational data on EPAC activation. Overall, CHESCA is a generally applicable method that utilizes a selected chemical library of effector analogs to quantitatively decode the binding and allosteric information content embedded in chemical shift changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Unified View of “How Allostery Works”
Tsai, C.-J., & Nussinov, R. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003394 · Cited by 401
Controlling Allosteric Networks in Proteins
Dokholyan, N. V. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00544 · Cited by 260
Allostery without a conformational change? Revisiting the paradigm
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C.-J. (2015) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.11.005 · Cited by 202
Mapping allosteric communications within individual proteins
Wang, J., Jain, A., McDonald, L. R., Gambogi, C., Lee, A. L., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17618-2 · Cited by 201
Principles of Allosteric Interactions in Cell Signaling
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C.-J., & Liu, J. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja510028c · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Selvaratnam, R., Chowdhury, S., VanSchouwen, B., & Melacini, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-03-28
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6133-6138
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2110810762
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping allostery through the covariance analysis of NMR chemical shifts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1017311108
- The paper
- Selvaratnam, R., Chowdhury, S., VanSchouwen, B., & Melacini, G. (2011). Mapping allostery through the covariance analysis of NMR chemical shifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017311108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.