Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subtype and pathway specific responses to anticancer compounds in breast cancer

Open access
Heiser, Laura M., Sadanandam, Anguraj, Kuo, Wen-Lin, Benz, Stephen C., Goldstein, Theodore C., Ng, Sam, Gibb, William J., Wang, Nicholas J., Ziyad, Safiyyah, Tong, Frances, Bayani, Nora, Hu, Zhi, Billig, Jessica I., Dueregger, Andrea, Lewis, Sophia, Jakkula, Lakshmi, Korkola, James E., Durinck, Steffen, Pepin, François, Guan, Yinghui, Purdom, Elizabeth, Neuvial, Pierre, Bengtsson, Henrik, Wood, Kenneth W., Smith, Peter G., Vassilev, Lyubomir T., Hennessy, Bryan T., Greshock, Joel, Bachman, Kurtis E., Hardwicke, Mary Ann, Park, John W., Marton, Laurence J., Wolf, Denise M., Collisson, Eric A., Neve, Richard M., Mills, Gordon B., Speed, Terence P., Feiler, Heidi S., Wooster, Richard F., Haussler, David, Stuart, Joshua M., Gray, Joe W., Spellman, Paul T.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Breast cancers are comprised of molecularly distinct subtypes that may respond differently to pathway-targeted therapies now under development. Collections of breast cancer cell lines mirror many of the molecular subtypes and pathways found in tumors, suggesting that treatment of cell lines with candidate therapeutic compounds can guide identification of associations between molecular subtypes, pathways, and drug response. In a test of 77 therapeutic compounds, nearly all drugs showed differential responses across these cell lines, and approximately one third showed subtype-, pathway-, and/or genomic aberration-specific responses. These observations suggest mechanisms of response and resistance and may inform efforts to develop molecular assays that predict clinical response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1018854108

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Heiser, L. M., Sadanandam, A., Kuo, W.-L., Benz, S. C., Goldstein, T. C., Ng, S., Gibb, W. J., Wang, N. J., Ziyad, S., Tong, F., Bayani, N., Hu, Z., Billig, J. I., Dueregger, A., Lewis, S., Jakkula, L., Korkola, J. E., Durinck, S., Pepin, F., Guan, Y., Purdom, E., Neuvial, P., Bengtsson, H., Wood, K. W., Smith, P. G., Vassilev, L. T., Hennessy, B. T., Greshock, J., Bachman, K. E., Hardwicke, M. A., Park, J. W., Marton, L. J., Wolf, D. M., Collisson, E. A., Neve, R. M., Mills, G. B., Speed, T. P., Feiler, H. S., Wooster, R. F., Haussler, D., Stuart, J. M., Gray, J. W., & Spellman, P. T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-10-14
Volume
109
Issue
8
Pages
2724-2729
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2162946128
Cited by
475
References
5
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subtype and pathway specific responses to anticancer compounds in breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1018854108
The paper
Heiser, L. M., Sadanandam, A., Kuo, W.-L., Benz, S. C., Goldstein, T. C., Ng, S., Gibb, W. J., Wang, N. J., Ziyad, S., Tong, F., Bayani, N., Hu, Z., Billig, J. I., Dueregger, A., Lewis, S., Jakkula, L., Korkola, J. E., Durinck, S., Pepin, F., . . . Spellman, P. T. (2012). Subtype and pathway specific responses to anticancer compounds in breast cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018854108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.