Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observation of spatial propagation of amyloid assembly from single nuclei

Open access
Knowles, Tuomas P. J., White, Duncan A., Abate, Adam R., Agresti, Jeremy J., Cohen, Samuel I. A., Sperling, Ralph A., De Genst, Erwin J., Dobson, Christopher M., Weitz, David A.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The crucial early stages of amyloid growth, in which normally soluble proteins are converted into fibrillar nanostructures, are challenging to study using conventional techniques yet are critical to the protein aggregation phenomena implicated in many common pathologies. As with all nucleation and growth phenomena, it is difficult to track individual nuclei in traditional macroscopic experiments, which probe the overall temporal evolution of the sample, but do not yield detailed information on the primary nucleation step as they mix independent stochastic events into an ensemble measurement. To overcome this limitation, we have developed microdroplet assays enabling us to detect single primary nucleation events and to monitor their subsequent spatial as well as temporal evolution, both of which we find to be determined by secondary nucleation phenomena. By deforming the droplets to high aspect ratio, we visualize in real-time propagating waves of protein assembly emanating from discrete primary nucleation sites. We show that, in contrast to classical gelation phenomena, the primary nucleation step is characterized by a striking dependence on system size, and the filamentous protein self-assembly process involves a highly nonuniform spatial distribution of aggregates. These findings deviate markedly from the current picture of amyloid growth and uncover a general driving force, originating from confinement, which, together with biological quality control mechanisms, helps proteins remain soluble and therefore functional in nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1105555108

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Knowles, T. P. J., White, D. A., Abate, A. R., Agresti, J. J., Cohen, S. I. A., Sperling, R. A., De Genst, E. J., Dobson, C. M., & Weitz, D. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-08-26
Volume
108
Issue
36
Pages
14746-14751
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2156700271
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of spatial propagation of amyloid assembly from single nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1105555108
The paper
Knowles, T. P. J., White, D. A., Abate, A. R., Agresti, J. J., Cohen, S. I. A., Sperling, R. A., De Genst, E. J., Dobson, C. M., & Weitz, D. A. (2011). Observation of spatial propagation of amyloid assembly from single nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105555108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.