The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observation of spatial propagation of amyloid assembly from single nuclei
Open accessAbstract
The crucial early stages of amyloid growth, in which normally soluble proteins are converted into fibrillar nanostructures, are challenging to study using conventional techniques yet are critical to the protein aggregation phenomena implicated in many common pathologies. As with all nucleation and growth phenomena, it is difficult to track individual nuclei in traditional macroscopic experiments, which probe the overall temporal evolution of the sample, but do not yield detailed information on the primary nucleation step as they mix independent stochastic events into an ensemble measurement. To overcome this limitation, we have developed microdroplet assays enabling us to detect single primary nucleation events and to monitor their subsequent spatial as well as temporal evolution, both of which we find to be determined by secondary nucleation phenomena. By deforming the droplets to high aspect ratio, we visualize in real-time propagating waves of protein assembly emanating from discrete primary nucleation sites. We show that, in contrast to classical gelation phenomena, the primary nucleation step is characterized by a striking dependence on system size, and the filamentous protein self-assembly process involves a highly nonuniform spatial distribution of aggregates. These findings deviate markedly from the current picture of amyloid growth and uncover a general driving force, originating from confinement, which, together with biological quality control mechanisms, helps proteins remain soluble and therefore functional in nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Self-citation
Cited by
The amyloid state and its association with protein misfolding diseases.
Knowles, T. P. J., Vendruscolo, M., & Dobson, C. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3810 · Cited by 2,382
Self-citationIn vivo cortical spreading pattern of tau and amyloid in the Alzheimer disease spectrum
Cho, H., Choi, J. Y., Hwang, M. S., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H. M., Lee, H. S., Lee, J. H., Ryu, Y. H., Lee, M. S., & Lyoo, C. H. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24711 · Cited by 499
Microfluidics: reframing biological enquiry
Duncombe, T. A., Tentori, A. M., & Herr, A. E. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4041 · Cited by 345
Levin, A., Mason, T. O., Adler-Abramovich, L., Buell, A. K., Meisl, G., Galvagnion, C., Bram, Y., Stratford, S. A., Dobson, C. M., Knowles, T. P. J., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6219 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knowles, T. P. J., White, D. A., Abate, A. R., Agresti, J. J., Cohen, S. I. A., Sperling, R. A., De Genst, E. J., Dobson, C. M., & Weitz, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-08-26
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 14746-14751
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2156700271
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of spatial propagation of amyloid assembly from single nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1105555108
- The paper
- Knowles, T. P. J., White, D. A., Abate, A. R., Agresti, J. J., Cohen, S. I. A., Sperling, R. A., De Genst, E. J., Dobson, C. M., & Weitz, D. A. (2011). Observation of spatial propagation of amyloid assembly from single nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105555108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.