The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fundamental relationship between operon organization and gene expression
Open accessAbstract
Half a century has passed since the discovery of operons (groups of genes that are transcribed together as a single mRNA). Despite the importance of operons in bacterial gene networks, the relationship between their organization and gene expression remains poorly understood. Here we show using synthetic operons in Escherichia coli that the expression of a given gene increases with the length of the operon and as its position moves farther from the end of the operon. These findings can be explained by a common mechanism; increasing the distance from the start of a gene to the end of the operon (termed the “transcription distance”) provides more time for translation to occur during transcription, resulting in increased expression. We confirmed experimentally that the increased expression is indeed due to increased translation. Furthermore our analysis indicates the translation initiation rate for an mRNA is sixfold greater during transcription than after its release, which amplifies the impact of the transcription distance on gene expression. As a result of these mechanisms, gene expression increases by ∼40% for each 1,000 nucleotides of transcription distance. In summary, we demonstrate that a fundamental relationship exists between gene expression and the number, length, and order of the genes in an operon. This relationship has important implications for understanding the functional basis of genome organization and practical applications for synthetic biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
Polypeptide-chain-elongation rate in Escherichia coli B/r as a function of growth rate
Young, R., & Bremer, H. (1976) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1600185 · Cited by 182 · cited 1×
“By definition L ≤ λ and it has been shown that μσ1 ∼ ρ (10, 11).”
Cited by
ePathBrick: A Synthetic Biology Platform for Engineering Metabolic Pathways in E. coli
Xu, P., Vansiri, A., Bhan, N., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2012) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb300016b · Cited by 255
Quality Control of Orphaned Proteins
Juszkiewicz, S., & Hegde, R. S. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.001 · Cited by 165
Geldart, K. G., Kommineni, S., Forbes, M., Hayward, M., Dunny, G. M., Salzman, N. H., & Kaznessis, Y. N. (2018) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10107 · Cited by 93
Transimulation - Protein Biosynthesis Web Service
Siwiak, M., & Zielenkiewicz, P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073943 · Cited by 50
Modular biomanufacturing for a sustainable production of terpenoid-based insect deterrents
Mischko, W., Hirte, M., Roehrer, S., Engelhardt, H., Mehlmer, N., Minceva, M., & Brück, T. (2018) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8gc00434j · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, H. N., Lee, Y., & Hussein, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-06-13
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 10626-10631
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1976257434
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental relationship between operon organization and gene expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1105692108
- The paper
- Lim, H. N., Lee, Y., & Hussein, R. (2011). Fundamental relationship between operon organization and gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105692108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.