The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative transcriptome and metabolite analysis of oil palm and date palm mesocarp that differ dramatically in carbon partitioning
Open accessAbstract
Oil palm can accumulate up to 90% oil in its mesocarp, the highest level observed in the plant kingdom. In contrast, the closely related date palm accumulates almost exclusively sugars. To gain insight into the mechanisms that lead to such an extreme difference in carbon partitioning, the transcriptome and metabolite content of oil palm and date palm were compared during mesocarp development. Compared with date palm, the high oil content in oil palm was associated with much higher transcript levels for all fatty acid synthesis enzymes, specific plastid transporters, and key enzymes of plastidial carbon metabolism, including phosphofructokinase, pyruvate kinase, and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Transcripts representing an ortholog of the WRI1 transcription factor were 57-fold higher in oil palm relative to date palm and displayed a temporal pattern similar to its target genes. Unexpectedly, despite more than a 100-fold difference in flux to lipids, most enzymes of triacylglycerol assembly were expressed at similar levels in oil palm and date palm. Similarly, transcript levels for all but one cytosolic enzyme of glycolysis were comparable in both species. Together, these data point to synthesis of fatty acids and supply of pyruvate in the plastid, rather than acyl assembly into triacylglycerol, as a major control over the storage of oil in the mesocarp of oil palm. In addition to greatly increasing molecular resources devoted to oil palm and date palm, the combination of temporal and comparative studies illustrates how deep sequencing can provide insights into gene expression patterns of two species that lack genome sequence information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibon, Y., Blaesing, O. E., Hannemann, J., Carillo, P., Höhne, M., Hendriks, J. H. M., Palacios, N., Cross, J., Selbig, J., & Stitt, M. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.025973 · Cited by 552
Cited by
The lipid biochemistry of eukaryotic algae
Li-Beisson, Y., Thelen, J. J., Fedosejevs, E., & Harwood, J. L. (2019) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2019.01.003 · Cited by 453
Li, J., Han, D., Wang, D., Ning, K., Jia, J., Wei, L., Jing, X., Huang, S., Chen, J., Li, Y., et al. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.121418 · Cited by 412
Biogenesis and functions of lipid droplets in plants
Chapman, K. D., Dyer, J. M., & Mullen, R. T. (2012) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r021436 · Cited by 396
Genome sequence of the date palm Phoenix dactylifera L
Al-Mssallem, I. S., Hu, S., Zhang, X., Lin, Q., Liu, W., Tan, J., Yu, X., Liu, J., Pan, L., Zhang, T., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3274 · Cited by 320
Ortiz, R., Geleta, M., Gustafsson, C., Lager, I., Hofvander, P., Löfstedt, C., Cahoon, E. B., Minina, E., Bozhkov, P., & Stymne, S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.003 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourgis, F., Kilaru, A., Cao, X., Ngando-Ebongue, G.-F., Drira, N., Ohlrogge, J. B., & Arondel, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-06-27
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 12527-12532
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2127627501
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative transcriptome and metabolite analysis of oil palm and date palm mesocarp that differ dramatically in carbon partitioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1106502108
- The paper
- Bourgis, F., Kilaru, A., Cao, X., Ngando-Ebongue, G.-F., Drira, N., Ohlrogge, J. B., & Arondel, V. (2011). Comparative transcriptome and metabolite analysis of oil palm and date palm mesocarp that differ dramatically in carbon partitioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106502108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.