The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultivation of an obligate acidophilic ammonia oxidizer from a nitrifying acid soil
Open accessAbstract
Nitrification is a fundamental component of the global nitrogen cycle and leads to significant fertilizer loss and atmospheric and groundwater pollution. Nitrification rates in acidic soils (pH < 5.5), which comprise 30% of the world's soils, equal or exceed those of neutral soils. Paradoxically, autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria and archaea, which perform the first stage in nitrification, demonstrate little or no growth in suspended liquid culture below pH 6.5, at which ammonia availability is reduced by ionization. Here we report the discovery and cultivation of a chemolithotrophic, obligately acidophilic thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidizer, “ Candidatus Nitrosotalea devanaterra,” from an acidic agricultural soil. Phylogenetic analysis places the organism within a previously uncultivated thaumarchaeal lineage that has been observed in acidic soils. Growth of the organism is optimal in the pH range 4 to 5 and is restricted to the pH range 4 to 5.5, unlike all previously cultivated ammonia oxidizers. Growth of this organism and associated ammonia oxidation and autotrophy also occur during nitrification in soil at pH 4.5. The discovery of Nitrosotalea devanaterra provides a previously unsuspected explanation for high rates of nitrification in acidic soils, and confirms the vital role that thaumarchaea play in terrestrial nitrogen cycling. Growth at extremely low ammonia concentration (0.18 nM) also challenges accepted views on ammonia uptake and metabolism and indicates novel mechanisms for ammonia oxidation at low pH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils
Leininger, S., Urich, T., Schloter, M., Schwark, L., Qi, J., Nicol, G. W., Prosser, J. I., Schuster, S. C., & Schleper, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04983 · Cited by 2,497
Self-citation
Cited by
Prosser, J. I., & Nicol, G. W. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.08.001 · Cited by 1,160
Self-citationPhysiology and Diversity of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea
Stahl, D. A., & de la Torre, J. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150128 · Cited by 593
Diversity, Physiology, and Niche Differentiation of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea
Hatzenpichler, R. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01960-12 · Cited by 532
Nitrification and nitrifiers in acidic soils
Li, Y., Chapman, S. J., Nicol, G. W., & Yao, H. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.023 · Cited by 523
Self-citationHink, L., Gubry-Rangin, C., Nicol, G. W., & Prosser, J. I. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-017-0025-5 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehtovirta-Morley, L. E., Stoecker, K., Vilcinskas, A., Prosser, J. I., & Nicol, G. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-09-06
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 15892-15897
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1978298060
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 71.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultivation of an obligate acidophilic ammonia oxidizer from a nitrifying acid soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1107196108
- The paper
- Lehtovirta-Morley, L. E., Stoecker, K., Vilcinskas, A., Prosser, J. I., & Nicol, G. W. (2011). Cultivation of an obligate acidophilic ammonia oxidizer from a nitrifying acid soil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107196108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.