The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remodeling of the postnatal mouse testis is accompanied by dramatic changes in stem cell number and niche accessibility
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about stem cell biology or the specialized environments or niches believed to control stem cell renewal and differentiation in self-renewing tissues of the body. Functional assays for stem cells are available only for hematopoiesis and spermatogenesis, and the microenvironment, or niche, for hematopoiesis is relatively inaccessible, making it difficult to analyze donor stem cell colonization events in recipients. In contrast, the recently developed spermatogonial stem cell assay system allows quantitation of individual colonization events, facilitating studies of stem cells and their associated microenvironment. By using this assay system, we found a 39-fold increase in male germ-line stem cells during development from birth to adult in the mouse. However, colony size or area of spermatogenesis generated by neonate and adult stem cells, 2–3 months after transplantation into adult tubules, was similar (∼0.5 mm 2). In contrast, the microenvironment in the immature pup testis was 9.4 times better than adult testis in allowing colonization events, and the area colonized per donor stem cell, whether from adult or pup, was about 4.0 times larger in recipient pups than adults. These factors facilitated the restoration of fertility by donor stem cells transplanted to infertile pups. Thus, our results demonstrate that stem cells and their niches undergo dramatic changes in the postnatal testis, and the microenvironment of the pup testis provides a more hospitable environment for transplantation of male germ-line stem cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The dominant-white spotting (W) locus of the mouse encodes the c-kit proto-oncogene
Geissler, E. N., Ryan, M. A., & Housman, D. E. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90020-7 · Cited by 1,287
The purification and characterization of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells
Morrison, S. J., Hemmati, H. D., Wandycz, A. M., & Weissman, I. L. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.22.10302 · Cited by 611
Growth and Differentiation in the Hemopoietic System
Dexter, T. M., & Spooncer, E. (1987) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.03.110187.002231 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Effects of Aging and Niche Microenvironment on Spermatogonial Stem Cell Self-Renewal
Ryu, B.-Y., Orwig, K. E., Oatley, J. M., Avarbock, M. R., & Brinster, R. L. (2006) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0580 · Cited by 265
Self-citationWang, X., Ding, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Ma, L., & Xie, X. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.049 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Shinohara, T., Orwig, K. E., Avarbock, M. R., & Brinster, R. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-05-22
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6186-6191
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2144166281
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.