Cited by 616Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeology and Rock Art Studies

Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa

Open access
Berna, Francesco, Goldberg, Paul, Horwitz, Liora Kolska, Brink, James, Holt, Sharon, Bamford, Marion, Chazan, Michael·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The ability to control fire was a crucial turning point in human evolution, but the question when hominins first developed this ability still remains. Here we show that micromorphological and Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (mFTIR) analyses of intact sediments at the site of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa, provide unambiguous evidence—in the form of burned bone and ashed plant remains—that burning took place in the cave during the early Acheulean occupation, approximately 1.0 Ma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the earliest secure evidence for burning in an archaeological context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1117620109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans have had the ability to control fire for 1 to 2 million years.

    “Humans have had the ability to control fire for 1 to 2 million years (Berna et al., 2012)”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Berna et al., 2012

    The paper’s opening section reports secure evidence of burning in an archaeological context at Wonderwerk Cave approximately 1.0 million years ago. It also says there is no consensus on when hominins first controlled fire and describes evidence associated with Homo erectus around 1.9 million years ago as scant and inconclusive. The claim therefore overstates what the paper establishes, particularly at the older end of the range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Alperson-Afil N, Goren-Inbar N (2010) The Acheulian Site of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov: Ancient Flames and Controlled Use of Fire (Springer, New York), Vol 2.
  2. Matmon A, Ron H, Chazan M, Porat N, Horwitz LK (2012) Reconstructing the history of sediment deposition in caves: A case study from Wonderwerk Cave. GSA Bull 124(3-4):611-625.
  3. Flügel E (2004) Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Interpretation and Application (Springer, New York).
  4. Onac BP, Effnberger HS, Breban RC (2007) High-temperature and "exotic" minerals from the Cioclovina Cave, Romania: A review. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Geologia 52:3-10.
  5. Courty MA, Goldberg P, Macphail RI (1989) Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge).
  6. Berna F (2010) Scientific Methods and Cultural Heritage. An Introduction to the Application of Materials Science to Archaeometry and Conservation Science, ed Artioli G (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp 364-367.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berna, F., Goldberg, P., Horwitz, L. K., Brink, J., Holt, S., Bamford, M., & Chazan, M.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • University of the Free State (ZA)
  • National Museum (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-04-02
Volume
109
Issue
20
Pages
E1215-20
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2133662818
Cited by
616
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 10
FWCI
185.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0917739, 0551927)
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
Keywords
Acheulean, Wonderwerk Cave, burnt bone, microstratigraphy, micromorphology
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthropology, Cultural Evolution, Fires, Fossils, Humans, South Africa, Hominidae, Microspectrophotometry, History, Ancient, Tool Use Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review