Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis

Open access
Fernandez-Fueyo, Elena, Ruiz-Dueñas, Francisco J., Ferreira, Patricia, Floudas, Dimitrios, Hibbett, David S., Canessa, Paulo, Larrondo, Luis F., James, Tim Y., Seelenfreund, Daniela, Lobos, Sergio, Polanco, Rubén, Tello, Mario, Honda, Yoichi, Watanabe, Takahito, Watanabe, Takashi, Ryu, Jae San, Kubicek, Christian P., Schmoll, Monika, Gaskell, Jill, Hammel, Kenneth E., St. John, Franz J., Vanden Wymelenberg, Amber, Sabat, Grzegorz, Splinter BonDurant, Sandra, Syed, Khajamohiddin, Yadav, Jagjit S., Doddapaneni, Harshavardhan, Subramanian, Venkataramanan, Lavín, José L., Oguiza, José A., Perez, Gumer, Pisabarro, Antonio G., Ramirez, Lucia, Santoyo, Francisco, Master, Emma, Coutinho, Pedro M., Henrissat, Bernard, Lombard, Vincent, Magnuson, Jon Karl, Kües, Ursula, Hori, Chiaki, Igarashi, Kiyohiko, Samejima, Masahiro, Held, Benjamin W., Barry, Kerrie W., LaButti, Kurt M., Lapidus, Alla, Lindquist, Erika A., Lucas, Susan M., Riley, Robert, Salamov, Asaf A., Hoffmeister, Dirk, Schwenk, Daniel, Hadar, Yitzhak, Yarden, Oded, de Vries, Ronald P., Wiebenga, Ad, Stenlid, Jan, Eastwood, Daniel, Grigoriev, Igor V., Berka, Randy M., Blanchette, Robert A., Kersten, Phil, Martinez, Angel T., Vicuna, Rafael, Cullen, Dan·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Efficient lignin depolymerization is unique to the wood decay basidiomycetes, collectively referred to as white rot fungi. Phanerochaete chrysosporium simultaneously degrades lignin and cellulose, whereas the closely related species, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, also depolymerizes lignin but may do so with relatively little cellulose degradation. To investigate the basis for selective ligninolysis, we conducted comparative genome analysis of C. subvermispora and P. chrysosporium . Genes encoding manganese peroxidase numbered 13 and five in C. subvermispora and P. chrysosporium , respectively. In addition, the C. subvermispora genome contains at least seven genes predicted to encode laccases, whereas the P. chrysosporium genome contains none. We also observed expansion of the number of C. subvermispora desaturase-encoding genes putatively involved in lipid metabolism. Microarray-based transcriptome analysis showed substantial up-regulation of several desaturase and MnP genes in wood-containing medium. MS identified MnP proteins in C. subvermispora culture filtrates, but none in P. chrysosporium cultures. These results support the importance of MnP and a lignin degradation mechanism whereby cleavage of the dominant nonphenolic structures is mediated by lipid peroxidation products. Two C. subvermispora genes were predicted to encode peroxidases structurally similar to P. chrysosporium lignin peroxidase and, following heterologous expression in Escherichia coli , the enzymes were shown to oxidize high redox potential substrates, but not Mn 2+ . Apart from oxidative lignin degradation, we also examined cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic systems in both fungi. In summary, the C. subvermispora genetic inventory and expression patterns exhibit increased oxidoreductase potential and diminished cellulolytic capability relative to P. chrysosporium .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1119912109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Fernandez-Fueyo, E., Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J., Ferreira, P., Floudas, D., Hibbett, D. S., Canessa, P., Larrondo, L. F., James, T. Y., Seelenfreund, D., Lobos, S., Polanco, R., Tello, M., Honda, Y., Watanabe, T., Watanabe, T., Ryu, J. S., Kubicek, C. P., Schmoll, M., Gaskell, J., Hammel, K. E., St. John, F. J., Vanden Wymelenberg, A., Sabat, G., Splinter BonDurant, S., Syed, K., Yadav, J. S., Doddapaneni, H., Subramanian, V., Lavín, J. L., Oguiza, J. A., Perez, G., Pisabarro, A. G., Ramirez, L., Santoyo, F., Master, E., Coutinho, P. M., Henrissat, B., Lombard, V., Magnuson, J. K., Kües, U., Hori, C., Igarashi, K., Samejima, M., Held, B. W., Barry, K. W., LaButti, K. M., Lapidus, A., Lindquist, E. A., Lucas, S. M., Riley, R., Salamov, A. A., Hoffmeister, D., Schwenk, D., Hadar, Y., Yarden, O., de Vries, R. P., Wiebenga, A., Stenlid, J., Eastwood, D., Grigoriev, I. V., Berka, R. M., Blanchette, R. A., Kersten, P., Martinez, A. T., Vicuna, R., & Cullen, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-03-20
Volume
109
Issue
14
Pages
5458-5463
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2122900876
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
35.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1119912109
The paper
Fernandez-Fueyo, E., Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J., Ferreira, P., Floudas, D., Hibbett, D. S., Canessa, P., Larrondo, L. F., James, T. Y., Seelenfreund, D., Lobos, S., Polanco, R., Tello, M., Honda, Y., Watanabe, T., Watanabe, T., Ryu, J. S., Kubicek, C. P., Schmoll, M., Gaskell, J., . . . Cullen, D. (2012). Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119912109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.