The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis
Open accessAbstract
Efficient lignin depolymerization is unique to the wood decay basidiomycetes, collectively referred to as white rot fungi. Phanerochaete chrysosporium simultaneously degrades lignin and cellulose, whereas the closely related species, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, also depolymerizes lignin but may do so with relatively little cellulose degradation. To investigate the basis for selective ligninolysis, we conducted comparative genome analysis of C. subvermispora and P. chrysosporium . Genes encoding manganese peroxidase numbered 13 and five in C. subvermispora and P. chrysosporium , respectively. In addition, the C. subvermispora genome contains at least seven genes predicted to encode laccases, whereas the P. chrysosporium genome contains none. We also observed expansion of the number of C. subvermispora desaturase-encoding genes putatively involved in lipid metabolism. Microarray-based transcriptome analysis showed substantial up-regulation of several desaturase and MnP genes in wood-containing medium. MS identified MnP proteins in C. subvermispora culture filtrates, but none in P. chrysosporium cultures. These results support the importance of MnP and a lignin degradation mechanism whereby cleavage of the dominant nonphenolic structures is mediated by lipid peroxidation products. Two C. subvermispora genes were predicted to encode peroxidases structurally similar to P. chrysosporium lignin peroxidase and, following heterologous expression in Escherichia coli , the enzymes were shown to oxidize high redox potential substrates, but not Mn 2+ . Apart from oxidative lignin degradation, we also examined cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic systems in both fungi. In summary, the C. subvermispora genetic inventory and expression patterns exhibit increased oxidoreductase potential and diminished cellulolytic capability relative to P. chrysosporium .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution
Janusz, G., Pawlik, A., Sulej, J., Świderska-Burek, U., Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A., & Paszczyński, A. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux049 · Cited by 984
Riley, R., Salamov, A. A., Brown, D. W., Nagy, L. G., Floudas, D., Held, B. W., Levasseur, A., Lombard, V., Morin, E., Otillar, R., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400592111 · Cited by 745
Self-citationGenome sequence of the model medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum
Chen, S., Xu, J., Liu, C., Zhu, Y., Nelson, D. R., Zhou, S., Li, C., Wang, L., Guo, X., Sun, Y., et al. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1923 · Cited by 579
Self-citationPlant-Polysaccharide-Degrading Enzymes from Basidiomycetes
Rytioja, J., Hildén, K., Yuzon, J., Hatakka, A., de Vries, R. P., & Mäkelä, M. R. (2014) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00035-14 · Cited by 447
Self-citationExploring bacterial lignin degradation
Brown, M. E., & Chang, M. C. (2014) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.11.015 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandez-Fueyo, E., Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J., Ferreira, P., Floudas, D., Hibbett, D. S., Canessa, P., Larrondo, L. F., James, T. Y., Seelenfreund, D., Lobos, S., Polanco, R., Tello, M., Honda, Y., Watanabe, T., Watanabe, T., Ryu, J. S., Kubicek, C. P., Schmoll, M., Gaskell, J., Hammel, K. E., St. John, F. J., Vanden Wymelenberg, A., Sabat, G., Splinter BonDurant, S., Syed, K., Yadav, J. S., Doddapaneni, H., Subramanian, V., Lavín, J. L., Oguiza, J. A., Perez, G., Pisabarro, A. G., Ramirez, L., Santoyo, F., Master, E., Coutinho, P. M., Henrissat, B., Lombard, V., Magnuson, J. K., Kües, U., Hori, C., Igarashi, K., Samejima, M., Held, B. W., Barry, K. W., LaButti, K. M., Lapidus, A., Lindquist, E. A., Lucas, S. M., Riley, R., Salamov, A. A., Hoffmeister, D., Schwenk, D., Hadar, Y., Yarden, O., de Vries, R. P., Wiebenga, A., Stenlid, J., Eastwood, D., Grigoriev, I. V., Berka, R. M., Blanchette, R. A., Kersten, P., Martinez, A. T., Vicuna, R., & Cullen, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-03-20
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5458-5463
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2122900876
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1119912109
- The paper
- Fernandez-Fueyo, E., Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J., Ferreira, P., Floudas, D., Hibbett, D. S., Canessa, P., Larrondo, L. F., James, T. Y., Seelenfreund, D., Lobos, S., Polanco, R., Tello, M., Honda, Y., Watanabe, T., Watanabe, T., Ryu, J. S., Kubicek, C. P., Schmoll, M., Gaskell, J., . . . Cullen, D. (2012). Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119912109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.