Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 775

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping

Open access
Gossett, Daniel R., Tse, Henry T. K., Lee, Serena A., Ying, Yong, Lindgren, Anne G., Yang, Otto O., Rao, Jianyu, Clark, Amander T., Di Carlo, Dino·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cell state is often assayed through measurement of biochemical and biophysical markers. Although biochemical markers have been widely used, intrinsic biophysical markers, such as the ability to mechanically deform under a load, are advantageous in that they do not require costly labeling or sample preparation. However, current techniques that assay cell mechanical properties have had limited adoption in clinical and cell biology research applications. Here, we demonstrate an automated microfluidic technology capable of probing single-cell deformability at approximately 2,000 cells/s. The method uses inertial focusing to uniformly deliver cells to a stretching extensional flow where cells are deformed at high strain rates, imaged with a high-speed camera, and computationally analyzed to extract quantitative parameters. This approach allows us to analyze cells at throughputs orders of magnitude faster than previously reported biophysical flow cytometers and single-cell mechanics tools, while creating easily observable larger strains and limiting user time commitment and bias through automation. Using this approach we rapidly assay the deformability of native populations of leukocytes and malignant cells in pleural effusions and accurately predict disease state in patients with cancer and immune activation with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 86%. As a tool for biological research, we show the deformability we measure is an early biomarker for pluripotent stem cell differentiation and is likely linked to nuclear structural changes. Microfluidic deformability cytometry brings the statistical accuracy of traditional flow cytometric techniques to label-free biophysical biomarkers, enabling applications in clinical diagnostics, stem cell characterization, and single-cell biophysics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1200107109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 775

Metadata

Authors
Gossett, D. R., Tse, H. T. K., Lee, S. A., Ying, Y., Lindgren, A. G., Yang, O. O., Rao, J., Clark, A. T., & Di Carlo, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-04-30
Volume
109
Issue
20
Pages
7630-7635
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2016983464
Cited by
775
References
0
FWCI
28.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1200107109
The paper
Gossett, D. R., Tse, H. T. K., Lee, S. A., Ying, Y., Lindgren, A. G., Yang, O. O., Rao, J., Clark, A. T., & Di Carlo, D. (2012). Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200107109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.