Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample
Open accessAbstract
It has been difficult to determine how cognitive systems change over the grand time scale of an entire life, as few cognitive systems are well enough understood; observable in infants, adolescents, and adults; and simple enough to measure to empower comparisons across vastly different ages. Here we address this challenge with data from more than 10,000 participants ranging from 11 to 85 years of age and investigate the precision of basic numerical intuitions and their relation to students’ performance in school mathematics across the lifespan. We all share a foundational number sense that has been observed in adults, infants, and nonhuman animals, and that, in humans, is generated by neurons in the intraparietal sulcus. Individual differences in the precision of this evolutionarily ancient number sense may impact school mathematics performance in children; however, we know little of its role beyond childhood. Here we find that population trends suggest that the precision of one’s number sense improves throughout the school-age years, peaking quite late at ∼30 y. Despite this gradual developmental improvement, we find very large individual differences in number sense precision among people of the same age, and these differences relate to school mathematical performance throughout adolescence and the adult years. The large individual differences and prolonged development of number sense, paired with its consistent and specific link to mathematics ability across the age span, hold promise for the impact of educational interventions that target the number sense.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Short-term memory for faces and quantity discrimination peaks around age 30.
“Recent evidence shows that whereas short-term memory for names and inverted faces peaks around 22, neither short-term memory for faces nor quantity discrimination peaks until around 30, a fact difficult to assimilate into the fluid/crystalized intelligence dichotomy (Germine, Duchaine, & Nakayama, 2011; Halberda, Ly, Wilmer, Naiman, & Germine, 2012).”
From When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span (2015) · cites this paper as Halberda, Ly, Wilmer, Naiman, & Germine, 2012
Short-term memory for names and inverted faces peaks around age 22.
“Recent evidence shows that whereas short-term memory for names and inverted faces peaks around 22, neither short-term memory for faces nor quantity discrimination peaks until around 30, a fact difficult to assimilate into the fluid/crystalized intelligence dichotomy (Germine, Duchaine, & Nakayama, 2011; Halberda, Ly, Wilmer, Naiman, & Germine, 2012).”
From When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span (2015) · cites this paper as Halberda, Ly, Wilmer, Naiman, & Germine, 2012
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641 · see citing works
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932 · see citing works
Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures
Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1202775 · Cited by 1,155 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Gathering large data sets from a varied population may become more common, as the internet allows scientists to engage ever larger groups (31).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hartshorne, J. K., & Germine, L. T. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614567339 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Self-citationA critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers
Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy
Ratcliff, R., Thompson, C. A., & McKoon, G. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Child, A. E., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Willcutt, E. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (2019) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219418775115 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Caviola, S., Colling, L. J., Mammarella, I. C., & Szűcs, D. (2020) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12957 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Exploring Numeracy in Word Embeddings
Naik, A., Ravichander, A., Rose, C., & Hovy, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1329 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Halberda, J., Ly, R., Wilmer, J. B., Naiman, D. Q., & Germine, L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Wellesley College (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-06-25
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 11116-11120
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3396479
- OpenAlex
- W1967654316
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 32.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (EY-013602, R01EY013602)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD057258, R01HD057258)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- number sense, numerical cognition, lifespan development, individual differences, mathematical ability, intraparietal sulcus, numerical precision, cognitive aging, educational intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Cognition, Humans, Individuality, Mathematics, Middle Aged, Neurons, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review