The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model for MLL translocations in therapy-related leukemia involving topoisomerase IIβ-mediated DNA strand breaks and gene proximity
Open accessAbstract
Topoisomerase poisons such as the epipodophyllotoxin etoposide are widely used effective cytotoxic anticancer agents. However, they are associated with the development of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemias (t-AMLs), which display characteristic balanced chromosome translocations, most often involving the mixed lineage leukemia ( MLL ) locus at 11q23. MLL translocation breakpoints in t-AMLs cluster in a DNase I hypersensitive region, which possesses cryptic promoter activity, implicating transcription as well as topoisomerase II activity in the translocation mechanism. We find that 2–3% of MLL alleles undergoing transcription do so in close proximity to one of its recurrent translocation partner genes, AF9 or AF4 , consistent with their sharing transcription factories. We show that most etoposide-induced chromosome breaks in the MLL locus and the overall genotoxicity of etoposide are dependent on topoisomerase IIβ, but that topoisomerase IIα and -β occupancy and etoposide-induced DNA cleavage data suggest factors other than local topoisomerase II concentration determine specific clustering of MLL translocation breakpoints in t-AML. We propose a model where DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced by topoisomerase IIβ into pairs of genes undergoing transcription within a common transcription factory become stabilized by antitopoisomerase II drugs such as etoposide, providing the opportunity for illegitimate end joining and translocation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells
Soutoglou, E., Dorn, J. F., Sengupta, K., Jasin, M., Nussenzweig, A., Ried, T., Danuser, G., & Misteli, T. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1591 · Cited by 509
A model for all genomes: the role of transcription factories
Cook, P. R. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.031 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Genome Organization Drives Chromosome Fragility
Canela, A., Maman, Y., Jung, S., Wong, N., Callen, E., Day, A., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Pekowska, A., Zhang, H., Rao, S. S. P., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.034 · Cited by 383
New Mechanistic and Functional Insights into DNA Topoisomerases
Chen, S. H., Chan, N.-L., & Hsieh, T.-S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061809-100002 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowell, I. G., Sondka, Z., Smith, K., Lee, K. C., Manville, C. M., Sidorczuk-Lesthuruge, M., Rance, H. A., Padget, K., Jackson, G. H., Adachi, N., & Austin, C. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-05-21
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8989-8994
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2047039095
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model for MLL translocations in therapy-related leukemia involving topoisomerase IIβ-mediated DNA strand breaks and gene proximity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1204406109
- The paper
- Cowell, I. G., Sondka, Z., Smith, K., Lee, K. C., Manville, C. M., Sidorczuk-Lesthuruge, M., Rance, H. A., Padget, K., Jackson, G. H., Adachi, N., & Austin, C. A. (2012). Model for MLL translocations in therapy-related leukemia involving topoisomerase IIβ-mediated DNA strand breaks and gene proximity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204406109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.