Cited by 133Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Structural differences between apoE3 and apoE4 may be useful in developing therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Frieden, Carl, Garai, Kanchan·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Apolipoproteins E3 and E4, proteins with a molecular mass of 34.15 kDa, differ by a single amino acid change. ApoE4 contains an arginine residue at position 112, whereas apoE3 has a cysteine at this position. ApoE4 is the major risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, whereas apoE3, the common isoform, is neutral with respect to this disease. Here, using literature data from both hydrogen-deuterium exchange and site-directed mutations, we suggest structural differences between these two isoforms that are distant from the site of the arginine-to-cysteine change. These structural differences involve sequences from both the N- and C-terminal domains, sequentially far apart but structurally close. In addition, these regions are close to regions that bind lipid and to a region involved in association of apoE monomers to higher molecular weight forms. We discuss the possibility that these regions could be targeted preferentially to affect the function of apoE4 relative to apoE3.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1207022109

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frieden, C., & Garai, K.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-05-21
Volume
109
Issue
23
Pages
8913-8918
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2034724732
Cited by
133
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103422)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE3, APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease, protein structure, single amino acid substitution, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, site-directed mutagenesis, N-terminal domain, C-terminal domain, lipid binding, oligomerization, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Protein Isoforms, Deuterium Exchange Measurement, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review