The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development
Open accessAbstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) control the dynamic spatial patterns of regulatory gene expression in development. Thus, in principle, GRN models may provide system-level, causal explanations of developmental process. To test this assertion, we have transformed a relatively well-established GRN model into a predictive, dynamic Boolean computational model. This Boolean model computes spatial and temporal gene expression according to the regulatory logic and gene interactions specified in a GRN model for embryonic development in the sea urchin. Additional information input into the model included the progressive embryonic geometry and gene expression kinetics. The resulting model predicted gene expression patterns for a large number of individual regulatory genes each hour up to gastrulation (30 h) in four different spatial domains of the embryo. Direct comparison with experimental observations showed that the model predictively computed these patterns with remarkable spatial and temporal accuracy. In addition, we used this model to carry out in silico perturbations of regulatory functions and of embryonic spatial organization. The model computationally reproduced the altered developmental functions observed experimentally. Two major conclusions are that the starting GRN model contains sufficiently complete regulatory information to permit explanation of a complex developmental process of gene expression solely in terms of genomic regulatory code, and that the Boolean model provides a tool with which to test in silico regulatory circuitry and developmental perturbations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks
Davidson, E. H. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09645 · Cited by 579
Self-citationHow embryos work: a comparative view of diverse modes of cell fate specification
Davidson, E. H. (1990) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.108.3.365 · Cited by 267
Self-citationModularity and design principles in the sea urchin embryo gene regulatory network
Peter, I. S., & Davidson, E. H. (2009) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.060 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Cited by
Hematopoiesis and T‐cell specification as a model developmental system
Rothenberg, E. V., Kueh, H. Y., Yui, M. A., & Zhang, J. A. (2016) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12417 · Cited by 36
Gupta, C., Xu, J., Jin, T., Khullar, S., Liu, X., Alatkar, S., Cheng, F., & Wang, D. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010287 · Cited by 33
Mbodj, A., Gustafson, E. H., Ciglar, L., Junion, G., Gonzalez, A., Girardot, C., Perrin, L., Furlong, E. E. M., & Thieffry, D. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005073 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Peter, I. S., Faure, E., & Davidson, E. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-08-27
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 16434-16442
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2067088953
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1207852109
- The paper
- Peter, I. S., Faure, E., & Davidson, E. H. (2012). Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207852109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.