Cited by 36T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Hematopoiesis and T‐cell specification as a model developmental system

Open access
Rothenberg, Ellen V., Kueh, Hao Yuan, Yui, Mary A., Zhang, Jingli A.·2016·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

Summary: The pathway to generate T cells from hematopoietic stem cells guides progenitors through a succession of fate choices while balancing differentiation progression against proliferation, stage to stage. Many elements of the regulatory system that controls this process are known, but the requirement for multiple, functionally distinct transcription factors needs clarification in terms of gene network architecture. Here, we compare the features of the T‐cell specification system with the rule sets underlying two other influential types of gene network models: first, the combinatorial, hierarchical regulatory systems that generate the orderly, synchronized increases in complexity in most invertebrate embryos; second, the dueling ‘master regulator’ systems that are commonly used to explain bistability in microbial systems and in many fate choices in terminal differentiation. The T‐cell specification process shares certain features with each of these prevalent models but differs from both of them in central respects. The T‐cell system is highly combinatorial but also highly dose‐sensitive in its use of crucial regulatory factors. The roles of these factors are not always T‐lineage‐specific, but they balance and modulate each other's activities long before any mutually exclusive silencing occurs. T‐cell specification may provide a new hybrid model for gene networks in vertebrate developmental systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imr.12417

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some PU.1 expression is still detectable at later stages, in the same individual cells that go through T-cell commitment marked by Bcl11b activation.

    “intracellular protein staining confirmed that some PU.1 expression is still detectable at later stages, in the same individual cells that go through T-cell commitment (marked by activation of the Bcl11b gene) (33, 93).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 150

  1. [2]Davidson EH The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution San Diego Academic Press 2006
  2. [3]Peter IS Davidson EH Genomic Control Process: Development and Evolution San Diego, CA Academic Press, Elsevier 2015
  3. [5]Oliveri P Tu Q Davidson EH Global regulatory logic for specification of an embryonic cell lineage Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 105 5955 5962 18413610 PMC2329687
  4. [6]Peter IS Davidson EH The endoderm gene regulatory network in sea urchin embryos up to mid-blastula stage Dev Biol 2009 340 188 199 19895806 PMC3981691
  5. [7]Davidson B Christiaen L Linking chordate gene networks to cellular behavior in ascidians Cell 2006 124 247 250 16439196
  6. [8]Kubo A Imai KS Satou Y Gene-regulatory networks in the Ciona embryos Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2009 8 250 255 19535506
  7. [9]Lemaire P Smith WC Nishida H Ascidians and the plasticity of the chordate developmental program Curr Biol 2008 18 R620 631 18644342 PMC2922861
  8. [10]Maduro MF Developmental robustness in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo Mol Reprod Dev 2015 26382067
  9. [11]Hobert O Development of left/right asymmetry in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system: from zygote to postmitotic neuron Genesis 2014 52 528 543 24510690
  10. [12]Stathopoulos A Levine M Localized repressors delineate the neurogenic ectoderm in the early Drosophila embryo Dev Biol 2005 280 482 493 15882587
  11. [13]Stathopoulos A Levine M Genomic regulatory networks and animal development Dev Cell 2005 9 449 462 16198288
  12. [14]Jaeger J The gap gene network Cell Mol Life Sci 2011 68 243 274 20927566 PMC3016493
  13. [15]Chen H Xu Z Mei C Yu D Small S A system of repressor gradients spatially organizes the boundaries of Bicoid-dependent target genes Cell 2012 149 618 629 22541432 PMC3535481
  14. [16]Barolo S Posakony JW Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling Genes Dev 2002 16 1167 1181 12023297
  15. [17]Arnosti DN Barolo S Levine M Small S The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy Development 1996 122 205 214 8565831
  16. [18]Small S Kraut R Hoey T Warrior R Levine M Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila Genes Dev 1991 5 827 839 2026328
  17. [19]Kim J Integration of positional signals and regulation of wing formation and identity by Drosophila vestigial gene Nature 1996 382 133 138 8700202
  18. [20]Yuh CH Bolouri H Davidson EH Genomic cis-regulatory logic: experimental and computational analysis of a sea urchin gene Science 1998 279 1896 1902 9506933
  19. [21]Flores GV Combinatorial signaling in the specification of unique cell fates Cell 2000 103 75 85 11051549
  20. [22]Peter IS Faure E Davidson EH Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 109 16434 16442 22927416 PMC3478651
  21. [23]Longabaugh WJ Davidson EH Bolouri H Visualization, documentation, analysis, and communication of large-scale gene regulatory networks Biochim Biophys Acta 2009 1789 363 374 18757046 PMC2762351
  22. [24]Longabaugh WJR Davidson EH Bolouri H Computational representation of developmental genetic regulatory networks Dev Biol 2005 283 1 16 15907831
  23. [25]Bolouri H Davidson EH Transcriptional regulatory cascades in development: initial rates, not steady state, determine network kinetics Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 9371 9376 12883007 PMC170925
  24. [27]Johnson AD Poteete AR Lauer G Sauer RT Ackers GK Ptashne M λ Repressor and cro--components of an efficient molecular switch Nature 1981 294 217 223 6457992
  25. [28]Ptashne M How the λ repressor and cro work Cell 1980 19 1 11 6444544
  26. [29]Naito T Taniuchi I The network of transcription factors that underlie the CD4 versus CD8 lineage decision Int Immunol 2010 22 791 796 20732858
  27. [30]Collins A Littman DR Taniuchi I RUNX proteins in transcription factor networks that regulate T-cell lineage choice Nat Rev Immunol 2009 9 106 115 19165227 PMC4231139
  28. [31]Wang L Bosselut R CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation: Thpok-ing into the nucleus J Immunol 2009 183 2903 2910 19696430 PMC3387994
  29. [32]Huang S Guo YP May G Enver T Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells Dev Biol 2007 305 695 713 17412320
  30. [33]Laslo P Multilineage transcriptional priming and determination of alternate hematopoietic cell fates Cell 2006 126 755 766 16923394
  31. [34]Roeder I Glauche I Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU. 1 J Theor Biol 2006 241 852 865 16510158
  32. [35]De Obaldia ME Bhandoola A Transcriptional regulation of innate and adaptive lymphocyte lineages Annu Rev Immunol 2015 33 607 642 25665079
  33. [36]Yui MA Rothenberg EV Developmental gene networks: a triathlon on the course to T cell identity Nat Rev Immunol 2014 14 529 545 25060579 PMC4153685
  34. [37]Love PE Bhandoola A Signal integration and crosstalk during thymocyte migration and emigration Nat Rev Immunol 2011 11 469 477 21701522 PMC3710714
  35. [38]Davidson EH Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks Nature 2010 468 911 920 21164479 PMC3967874
  36. [39]Akashi K Reya T Dalma-Weiszhausz D Weissman IL Lymphoid precursors Curr Opin Immunol 2000 12 144 150 10712944
  37. [40]Månsson R Molecular evidence for hierarchical transcriptional lineage priming in fetal and adult stem cells and multipotent progenitors Immunity 2007 26 407 419 17433729
  38. [41]Adolfsson J Identification of Flt3+ lympho-myeloid stem cells lacking erythro-megakaryocytic potential: a revised road map for adult blood lineage commitment Cell 2005 121 295 306 15851035
  39. [42]Akashi K Traver D Zon LI The complex cartography of stem cell commitment Cell 2005 121 160 162 15851023
  40. [43]Arinobu Y Reciprocal activation of GATA-1 and PU. 1 marks initial specification of hematopoietic stem cells into myeloerythroid and myelolymphoid lineages Cell Stem Cell 2007 1 416 427 18371378
  41. [44]Doulatov S Notta F Eppert K Nguyen LT Ohashi PS Dick JE Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development Nat Immunol 2010 11 585 593 20543838
  42. [45]Graf T Zon LI Transcription factors that induce commitment of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors: lessons from the MEP system Hematopoiesis: a Developmental Approach New York Oxford University Press 2001 355 362
  43. [48]Zhang P Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU. 1 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96 8705 8710 10411939 PMC17580
  44. [49]Dahl R Regulation of macrophage and neutrophil cell fates by the PU. 1:C/EBPα ratio and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Nat Immunol 2003 4 1029 1036 12958595
  45. [50]Guo G Mapping cellular hierarchy by single-cell analysis of the cell surface repertoire Cell Stem Cell 2013 13 492 505 24035353 PMC3845089
  46. [51]Moignard V Characterization of transcriptional networks in blood stem and progenitor cells using high-throughput single-cell gene expression analysis Nat Cell Biol 2013 15 363 372 23524953 PMC3796878
  47. [52]Lu M Kawamoto H Katsube Y Ikawa T Katsura Y The common myelolymphoid progenitor: a key intermediate stage in hemopoiesis generating T and B cells J Immunol 2002 169 3519 3525 12244141
  48. [53]Akashi K Traver D Miyamoto T Weissman IL A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages Nature 2000 404 193 197 10724173
  49. [54]Katsura Y Kawamoto H Stepwise lineage restriction of progenitors in lympho-myelopoiesis Int Rev Immunol 2001 20 1 20 11342295
  50. [55]Paul F Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors Cell 2015 163 1663 1677 26627738
  51. [57]Notta F Distinct routes of lineage development reshape the human blood hierarchy across ontogeny Science 2016 351 aab2116 26541609 PMC4816201
  52. [60]Monteiro R Pouget C Patient R The gata1/pu1 lineage fate paradigm varies between blood populations and is modulated by tif1γ EMBO J 2011 30 1093 1103 21336259 PMC3061038
  53. [61]Chickarmane V Enver T Peterson C Computational modeling of the hematopoietic erythroid-myeloid switch reveals insights into cooperativity, priming, and irreversibility PLoS Comput Biol 2009 5 e1000268 19165316 PMC2613533
  54. [62]Chlon TM Dore LC Crispino JD Cofactor-mediated restriction of GATA-1 chromatin occupancy coordinates lineage-specific gene expression Mol Cell 2012 47 608 621 22771118 PMC3432917
  55. [63]Cantor AB Antagonism of FOG-1 and GATA factors in fate choice for the mast cell lineage J Exp Med 2008 205 611 624 18299398 PMC2275384
  56. [64]Iwasaki H The order of expression of transcription factors directs hierarchical specification of hematopoietic lineages Genes Dev 2006 20 3010 3021 17079688 PMC1620021
  57. [66]Spooner CJ Cheng JX Pujadas E Laslo P Singh H A recurrent network involving the transcription factors PU. 1 and Gfi1 orchestrates innate and adaptive immune cell fates Immunity 2009 31 576 586 19818654 PMC4373467
  58. [67]Hsu CL King-Fleischman AG Lai AY Matsumoto Y Weissman IL Kondo M Antagonistic effect of CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-α and Pax5 in myeloid or lymphoid lineage choice in common lymphoid progenitors Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 672 677 16407117 PMC1334685
  59. [68]Pongubala JM Transcription factor EBF restricts alternative lineage options and promotes B cell fate commitment independently of Pax5 Nat Immunol 2008 9 203 215 18176567
  60. [69]De Obaldia ME T cell development requires constraint of the myeloid regulator C/EBP-α by the Notch target and transcriptional repressor Hes1 Nat Immunol 2013 14 1277 1284 24185616 PMC4038953
  61. [70]McNagny KM Sieweke MH Doderlein G Graf T Nerlov C Regulation of eosinophil-specific gene expression by a C/EBP-Ets complex and GATA-1 EMBO J 1998 17 3669 3680 9649437 PMC1170703
  62. [71]Du J Novel combinatorial interactions of GATA-1, PU. 1, and C/EBPî isoforms regulate transcription of the gene encoding eosinophil granule major basic protein J Biol Chem 2002 277 43481 43494 12202480
  63. [72]Heavey B Charalambous C Cobaleda C Busslinger M Myeloid lineage switch of Pax5 mutant but not wild-type B cell progenitors by C/EBPα and GATA factors EMBO J 2003 22 3887 3897 12881423 PMC169053
  64. [73]Zandi S Åhsberg J Tsapogas P Stjernberg J Qian H Sigvardsson M Single-cell analysis of early B-lymphocyte development suggests independent regulation of lineage specification and commitment in vivo Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 109 15871 15876 23019372 PMC3465423
  65. [74]Welinder E Åhsberg J Sigvardsson M B-lymphocyte commitment: identifying the point of no return Semin Immunol 2011 23 335 340 21944938
  66. [75]Mansson R Single-cell analysis of the common lymphoid progenitor compartment reveals functional and molecular heterogeneity Blood 2010 115 2601 2609 19996414
  67. [76]De Obaldia ME Bell JJ Bhandoola A Early T-cell progenitors are the major granulocyte precursors in the adult mouse thymus Blood 2013 121 64 71 23152541 PMC3538332
  68. [77]Luc S The earliest thymic T cell progenitors sustain B cell and myeloid lineage potential Nat Immunol 2012 13 412 419 22344248 PMC3378629
  69. [78]Yui MA Feng N Rothenberg EV Fine-scale staging of T cell lineage commitment in adult mouse thymus J Immunol 2010 185 284 293 20543111 PMC4091773
  70. [79]Bell JJ Bhandoola A The earliest thymic progenitors for T cells possess myeloid lineage potential Nature 2008 452 764 767 18401411
  71. [82]Perry SS Wang H Pierce LJ Yang AM Tsai S Spangrude GJ L-Selectin defines a bone marrow analogue to the thymic Early T-lineage Progenitor Blood 2004 103 2990 2996 15070675
  72. [83]Wu L Antica M Johnson GR Scollay R Shortman K Developmental potential of the earliest precursor cells from the adult mouse thymus J Exp Med 1991 174 1617 1627 1683894 PMC2119056
  73. [85]García-Ojeda ME GATA-3 promotes T cell specification by repressing B cell potential in pro-T cells Blood 2013 121 1749 1759 23287858
  74. [86]Heinzel K Benz C Martins VC Haidl ID Bleul CC Bone marrow-derived hemopoietic precursors commit to the T cell lineage only after arrival in the thymic microenvironment J Immunol 2007 178 858 868 17202347
  75. [89]DeKoter RP Singh H Regulation of B lymphocyte and macrophage development by graded expression of PU. 1 Science 2000 288 1439 1441 10827957
  76. [90]Zarnegar MA Rothenberg EV Ikaros represses and activates PU. 1 cell-type-specifically through the multifunctional Sfpi1 URE and a myeloid specific enhancer Oncogene 2012 31 4647 4654 22231443 PMC3679182
  77. [92]Chen H PU. 1 (Spi-1) autoregulates its expression in myeloid cells Oncogene 1995 11 1549 1560 7478579
  78. [93]Ng SY Yoshida T Zhang J Georgopoulos K Genome-wide lineage-specific transcriptional networks underscore Ikaros-dependent lymphoid priming in hematopoietic stem cells Immunity 2009 30 493 507 19345118 PMC3012962
  79. [96]Manesso E Chickarmane V Kueh HY Rothenberg EV Peterson C Computational modelling of T-cell formation kinetics: output regulated by initial proliferation-linked deferral of developmental competence J R Soc Interface 2013 10 20120774 23152106 PMC3565808
  80. [97]Lu M The earliest thymic progenitors in adults are restricted to T, NK, and dendritic cell lineage and have a potential to form more diverse TCRβ chains than fetal progenitors J Immunol 2005 175 5848 5856 16237077
  81. [98]Schlenner SM Fate mapping reveals separate origins of T cells and myeloid lineages in the thymus Immunity 2010 32 426 436 20303297
  82. [99]Del Real MM Rothenberg EV Architecture of a lymphomyeloid developmental switch controlled by PU. 1, Notch and Gata3 Development 2013 140 1207 1219 23444353 PMC3585658
  83. [101]Laiosa CV Stadtfeld M Xie H de Andres-Aguayo L Graf T Reprogramming of committed T cell progenitors to macrophages and dendritic cells by C/EBPα and PU. 1 transcription factors Immunity 2006 25 731 744 17088084
  84. [102]Wilson A MacDonald HR Radtke F Notch 1-deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus J Exp Med 2001 194 1003 1012 11581321 PMC2193487
  85. [103]Sambandam A Notch signaling controls the generation and differentiation of early T lineage progenitors Nat Immunol 2005 6 663 670 15951813
  86. [104]Tan JB Visan I Yuan JS Guidos CJ Requirement for Notch1 signals at sequential early stages of intrathymic T cell development Nat Immunol 2005 6 671 679 15951812
  87. [105]El-Kassar N High levels of IL-7 cause dysregulation of thymocyte development Int Immunol 2012 24 661 671 22899673 PMC3530313
  88. [106]Prockop SE Petrie HT Regulation of thymus size by competition for stromal niches among early T cell progenitors J Immunol 2004 173 1604 1611 15265888
  89. [107]Munitic I Dynamic regulation of IL-7 receptor expression is required for normal thymopoiesis Blood 2004 104 4165 4172 15328149
  90. [108]Cai Z Haploinsufficiency of AML1 affects the temporal and spatial generation of hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse embryo Immunity 2000 13 423 431 11070161
  91. [109]Lacaud G Kouskoff V Trumble A Schwantz S Keller G Haploinsufficiency of Runx1 results in the acceleration of mesodermal development and hemangioblast specification upon in vitro differentiation of ES cells Blood 2004 103 886 889 14525762
  92. [110]Rodrigues NP Haploinsufficiency of GATA-2 perturbs adult hematopoietic stem-cell homeostasis Blood 2005 106 477 484 15811962
  93. [112]O’Riordan M Grosschedl R Coordinate regulation of B cell differentiation by the transcription factors EBF and E2A Immunity 1999 11 21 31 10435576
  94. [113]Lukin K Compound haploinsufficiencies of Ebf1 and Runx1 genes impede B cell lineage progression Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 107 7869 7874 20385820 PMC2867885
  95. [114]Ungerbäck J Ahsberg J Strid T Somasundaram R Sigvardsson M Combined heterozygous loss of Ebf1 and Pax5 allows for T-lineage conversion of B cell progenitors J Exp Med 2015 212 1109 1123 26056231 PMC4493409
  96. [115]Ku CJ Lim KC Kalantry S Maillard I Engel JD Hosoya T A monoallelic-to-biallelic T-cell transcriptional switch regulates GATA3 abundance Genes Dev 2015 29 1930 1941 26385963 PMC4579350
  97. [116]Hosoya T GATA-3 is required for early T lineage progenitor development J Exp Med 2009 206 2987 3000 19934022 PMC2806453
  98. [119]Kreslavsky T β-Selection-induced proliferation is required for αβ T cell differentiation Immunity 2012 37 840 853 23159226 PMC3709258
  99. [120]Falk I Biro J Kohler H Eichmann K Proliferation kinetics associated with T cell receptor-β chain selection of fetal murine thymocytes J Exp Med 1996 184 2327 2339 8976187 PMC2196377
  100. [121]Mossadegh-Keller N M-CSF instructs myeloid lineage fate in single haematopoietic stem cells Nature 2013 497 239 243 23575636 PMC3679883
  101. [122]Shibata Y Berclaz PY Chroneos ZC Yoshida M Whitsett JA Trapnell BC GM-CSF regulates alveolar macrophage differentiation and innate immunity in the lung through PU. 1 Immunity 2001 15 557 567 11672538
  102. [123]Tsapogas P IL-7 mediates Ebf-1-dependent lineage restriction in early lymphoid progenitors Blood 2011 118 1283 1290 21652681
  103. [124]Kikuchi K Kasai H Watanabe A Lai AY Kondo M IL-7 specifies B cell fate at the common lymphoid progenitor to pre-proB transition stage by maintaining early B cell factor expression J Immunol 2008 181 383 392 18566404 PMC2586338
  104. [125]Dias S Silva H Jr Cumano A Vieira P Interleukin-7 is necessary to maintain the B cell potential in common lymphoid progenitors J Exp Med 2005 201 971 979 15767371 PMC2213099
  105. [126]Kikuchi K Lai AY Hsu CL Kondo M IL-7 receptor signaling is necessary for stage transition in adult B cell development through up-regulation of EBF J Exp Med 2005 201 1197 1203 15837809 PMC2213146
  106. [127]Boller S Grosschedl R The regulatory network of B-cell differentiation: a focused view of early B-cell factor 1 function Immunol Rev 2014 261 102 115 25123279 PMC4312928
  107. [128]Malin S Role of STAT5 in controlling cell survival and immunoglobulin gene recombination during pro-B cell development Nat Immunol 2010 11 171 179 19946273 PMC2956121
  108. [129]Massa S Balciunaite G Ceredig R Rolink AG Critical role for c-kit (CD117) in T cell lineage commitment and early thymocyte development in vitro Eur J Immunol 2006 36 526 532 16482516
  109. [130]Seshasayee D Gaines P Wojchowski DM GATA-1 dominantly activates a program of erythroid gene expression in factor-dependent myeloid FDCW2 cells Mol Cell Biol 1998 18 3278 3288 9584168 PMC108909
  110. [131]Dionne CJ Subversion of T lineage commitment by PU. 1 in a clonal cell line system Dev Biol 2005 280 448 466 15882585
  111. [133]Yu Y Bcl11a is essential for lymphoid development and negatively regulates p53 J Exp Med 2012 209 2467 2483 23230003 PMC3526365
  112. [135]Zohren F The transcription factor Lyl-1 regulates lymphoid specification and the maintenance of early T lineage progenitors Nat Immunol 2012 13 761 769 22772404 PMC3411897
  113. [138]Cauchy P Dynamic recruitment of Ets1 to both nucleosome-occupied and -depleted enhancer regions mediates a transcriptional program switch during early T-cell differentiation Nucleic Acids Res 2015 PMC4856961 26673693
  114. [139]Hendriks RW Nawijn MC Engel JD van Doorninck H Grosveld F Karis A Expression of the transcription factor GATA-3 is required for the development of the earliest T cell progenitors and correlates with stages of cellular proliferation in the thymus Eur J Immunol 1999 29 1912 1918 10382753
  115. [140]Hosoya T Maillard I Engel JD From the cradle to the grave: activities of GATA-3 throughout T-cell development and differentiation Immunol Rev 2010 238 110 125 20969588 PMC2965564
  116. [141]Ho IC Tai TS Pai SY GATA3 and the T-cell lineage: essential functions before and after T-helper-2-cell differentiation Nat Rev Immunol 2009 9 125 135 19151747 PMC2998182
  117. [142]Anderson MK Hernandez-Hoyos G Dionne CJ Arias AM Chen D Rothenberg EV Definition of regulatory network elements for T cell development by perturbation analysis with PU. 1 and GATA-3 Dev Biol 2002 246 103 121 12027437
  118. [143]Xu W Carr T Ramirez K McGregor S Sigvardsson M Kee BL E2A transcription factors limit expression of Gata3 to facilitate T lymphocyte lineage commitment Blood 2013 121 1534 1542 23297135 PMC3587319
  119. [145]Ouyang W Stat6-independent GATA-3 autoactivation directs IL-4-independent Th2 development and commitment Immunity 2000 12 27 37 10661403
  120. [146]Klein Wolterink RGJ Essential, dose-dependent role for the transcription factor Gata3 in the development of IL-5+ and IL-13+ type 2 innate lymphoid cells Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013 110 10240 10245 23733962 PMC3690884
  121. [147]Pai SY Truitt ML Ting CN Leiden JM Glimcher LH Ho IC Critical roles for transcription factor GATA-3 in thymocyte development Immunity 2003 19 863 875 14670303
  122. [148]Nawijn MC Enforced expression of GATA-3 during T cell development inhibits maturation of CD8 single-positive cells and induces thymic lymphoma in transgenic mice J Immunol 2001 167 715 723 11441075
  123. [149]Ostuni R Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells Cell 2013 152 157 171 23332752
  124. [150]Pham T-H Mechanisms of in vivo binding site selection of the hematopoietic master transcription factor PU. 1 Nucleic Acids Res 2013 41 6391 6402 23658224 PMC3711439
  125. [151]Heinz S Effect of natural genetic variation on enhancer selection and function Nature 2013 503 487 492 24121437 PMC3994126
  126. [152]Wontakal SN A core erythroid transcriptional network is repressed by a master regulator of myelo-lymphoid differentiation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 109 3832 3837 22357756 PMC3309740
  127. [154]Heinz S Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities Mol Cell 2010 38 576 589 20513432 PMC2898526
  128. [155]Wei G Genome-wide analyses of transcription factor GATA3-mediated gene regulation in distinct T cell types Immunity 2011 35 299 311 21867929 PMC3169184
  129. [156]Gimferrer I Regulation of GATA-3 expression during CD4 lineage differentiation J Immunol 2011 186 3892 3898 21357543 PMC3074202
  130. [157]Weber BN A critical role for TCF-1 in T-lineage specification and differentiation Nature 2011 476 63 68 21814277 PMC3156435
  131. [158]Li L A far downstream enhancer for murine Bcl11b controls its T-cell specific expression Blood 2013 122 902 911 23741008 PMC3739036
  132. [160]Guo Y Maillard I Chakraborti S Rothenberg EV Speck NA Core binding factors are necessary for natural killer cell development, and cooperate with Notch signaling during T cell specification Blood 2008 112 480 492 18390836 PMC2481540
  133. [161]Ikawa T An essential developmental checkpoint for production of the T cell lineage Science 2010 329 93 96 20595615
  134. [162]Li L Leid M Rothenberg EV An early T cell lineage commitment checkpoint dependent on the transcription factor Bcl11b Science 2010 329 89 93 20595614 PMC2935300
  135. [163]Wakabayashi Y Bcl11b is required for differentiation and survival of αβ T lymphocytes Nat Immunol 2003 4 533 539 12717433
  136. [164]Zhang JA Global Analysis of Dynamic Epigenetic Marking and Transcriptional Regulation Underlying T-cell Lineage Commitment PhD Thesis California Institute of Technology 2012
  137. [165]Mingueneau M The transcriptional landscape of αβ T cell differentiation Nat Immunol 2013 14 619 632 23644507 PMC3660436
  138. [166]Serafini N Vosshenrich CA Di Santo JP Transcriptional regulation of innate lymphoid cell fate Nat Rev Immunol 2015 15 415 428 26065585
  139. [167]Walker JA Bcl11b is essential for group 2 innate lymphoid cell development J Exp Med 2015 212 875 882 25964370 PMC4451131
  140. [168]Yu Y The transcription factor Bcl11b is specifically expressed in group 2 innate lymphoid cells and is essential for their development J Exp Med 2015 212 865 874 25964371 PMC4451136
  141. [169]Califano D Transcription factor Bcl11b controls identity and function of mature Type 2 innate lymphoid cells Immunity 2015 43 354 368 26231117 PMC4657441
  142. [170]Cismasiu VB BCL11B participates in the activation of interleukin-2 gene expression in CD4+ T lymphocytes Blood 2006 108 2695 2702 16809611 PMC1895584
  143. [172]Steinke FC TCF-1 and LEF-1 act upstream of Th-POK to promote the CD4+ T cell fate and interact with Runx3 to silence Cd4 in CD8+ T cells Nat Immunol 2014 15 646 656 24836425 PMC4064003
  144. [173]Vanvalkenburgh J Critical role of Bcl11b in suppressor function of T regulatory cells and prevention of inflammatory bowel disease J Exp Med 2011 208 2069 2081 21875956 PMC3182057
  145. [174]Barra MM Transcription Factor 7 Limits Regulatory T Cell Generation in the Thymus J Immunol 2015 195 3058 3070 26324778
  146. [175]De Pooter RF Kee BL E proteins and the regulation of early lymphocyte development Immunol Rev 2010 238 93 109 20969587 PMC2992984
  147. [177]Vigano MA An epigenetic profile of early T-cell development from multipotent progenitors to committed T-cell descendants Eur J Immunol 2014 44 1181 1193 24374622
  148. [178]Richie Ehrlich LI Serwold T Weissman IL In vitro assays misrepresent in vivo lineage potentials of murine lymphoid progenitors Blood 2011 117 2618 2624 21163922 PMC3062354
  149. [179]Inlay MA Ly6d marks the earliest stage of B-cell specification and identifies the branchpoint between B-cell and T-cell development Genes Dev 2009 23 2376 2381 19833765 PMC2764492
  150. [180]Wong SH Transcription factor RORα is critical for nuocyte development Nat Immunol 2012 13 229 236 22267218 PMC3343633

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothenberg, E. V., Kueh, H. Y., Yui, M. A., & Zhang, J. A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Rothenberg, Ellen V.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-18
Volume
271
Issue
1
Pages
72-97
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2341654127
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (RC2CA148278, R01AI083514, R01AI095943, R01CA90233, R01HD076915, R01HL119102, R01AI064590, K99HL119638A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
hematopoiesis, hematopoietic stem cells, transcription factors, gene regulatory networks, combinatorial regulation, bistability, dosage sensitivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Immune System, Models, Biological, T-Lymphocytes, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cell Lineage, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review