Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase competition in trisected superconducting dome

Open access
Vishik, I. M., Hashimoto, M., He, Rui-Hua, Lee, Wei-Sheng, Schmitt, Felix, Lu, Donghui, Moore, R. G., Zhang, C., Meevasana, W., Sasagawa, T., Uchida, S., Fujita, Kazuhiro, Ishida, S., Ishikado, M., Yoshida, Yoshiyuki, Eisaki, Hiroshi, Hussain, Zahid, Devereaux, Thomas P., Shen, Zhi-Xun·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A detailed phenomenology of low energy excitations is a crucial starting point for microscopic understanding of complex materials, such as the cuprate high-temperature superconductors. Because of its unique momentum-space discrimination, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) is ideally suited for this task in the cuprates, where emergent phases, particularly superconductivity and the pseudogap, have anisotropic gap structure in momentum space. We present a comprehensive doping- and temperature-dependence ARPES study of spectral gaps in Bi 2 Sr 2 CaCu 2 O 8+ δ , covering much of the superconducting portion of the phase diagram. In the ground state, abrupt changes in near-nodal gap phenomenology give spectroscopic evidence for two potential quantum critical points, p = 0.19 for the pseudogap phase and p = 0.076 for another competing phase. Temperature dependence reveals that the pseudogap is not static below T c and exists p > 0.19 at higher temperatures. Our data imply a revised phase diagram that reconciles conflicting reports about the endpoint of the pseudogap in the literature, incorporates phase competition between the superconducting gap and pseudogap, and highlights distinct physics at the edge of the superconducting dome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1209471109

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Vishik, I. M., Hashimoto, M., He, R.-H., Lee, W.-S., Schmitt, F., Lu, D., Moore, R. G., Zhang, C., Meevasana, W., Sasagawa, T., Uchida, S., Fujita, K., Ishida, S., Ishikado, M., Yoshida, Y., Eisaki, H., Hussain, Z., Devereaux, T. P., & Shen, Z.-X.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
109
Issue
45
Pages
18332-18337
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2072186540
Cited by
269
References
37
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase competition in trisected superconducting dome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1209471109
The paper
Vishik, I. M., Hashimoto, M., He, R.-H., Lee, W.-S., Schmitt, F., Lu, D., Moore, R. G., Zhang, C., Meevasana, W., Sasagawa, T., Uchida, S., Fujita, K., Ishida, S., Ishikado, M., Yoshida, Y., Eisaki, H., Hussain, Z., Devereaux, T. P., & Shen, Z.-X. (2012). Phase competition in trisected superconducting dome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209471109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.