Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioinspired multivalent DNA network for capture and release of cells

Open access
Zhao, Weian, Cui, Cheryl H., Bose, Suman, Guo, Dagang, Shen, Chong, Wong, Wesley P., Halvorsen, Ken, Farokhzad, Omid C., Teo, Grace Sock Leng, Phillips, Joseph A., Dorfman, David M., Karnik, Rohit, Karp, Jeffrey M.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Capture and isolation of flowing cells and particulates from body fluids has enormous implications in diagnosis, monitoring, and drug testing, yet monovalent adhesion molecules used for this purpose result in inefficient cell capture and difficulty in retrieving the captured cells. Inspired by marine creatures that present long tentacles containing multiple adhesive domains to effectively capture flowing food particulates, we developed a platform approach to capture and isolate cells using a 3D DNA network comprising repeating adhesive aptamer domains that extend over tens of micrometers into the solution. The DNA network was synthesized from a microfluidic surface by rolling circle amplification where critical parameters, including DNA graft density, length, and sequence, could readily be tailored. Using an aptamer that binds to protein tyrosine kinase-7 (PTK7) that is overexpressed on many human cancer cells, we demonstrate that the 3D DNA network significantly enhances the capture efficiency of lymphoblast CCRF-CEM cells over monovalent aptamers and antibodies, yet maintains a high purity of the captured cells. When incorporated in a herringbone microfluidic device, the 3D DNA network not only possessed significantly higher capture efficiency than monovalent aptamers and antibodies, but also outperformed previously reported cell-capture microfluidic devices at high flow rates. This work suggests that 3D DNA networks may have broad implications for detection and isolation of cells and other bioparticles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1211234109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, W., Cui, C. H., Bose, S., Guo, D., Shen, C., Wong, W. P., Halvorsen, K., Farokhzad, O. C., Teo, G. S. L., Phillips, J. A., Dorfman, D. M., Karnik, R., & Karp, J. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-11-12
Volume
109
Issue
48
Pages
19626-19631
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2104092717
Cited by
284
References
1
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioinspired multivalent DNA network for capture and release of cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1211234109
The paper
Zhao, W., Cui, C. H., Bose, S., Guo, D., Shen, C., Wong, W. P., Halvorsen, K., Farokhzad, O. C., Teo, G. S. L., Phillips, J. A., Dorfman, D. M., Karnik, R., & Karp, J. M. (2012). Bioinspired multivalent DNA network for capture and release of cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211234109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.