The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies
Open accessAbstract
Molecular dating of species divergences has become an important means to add a temporal dimension to the Tree of Life. Increasingly larger datasets encompassing greater taxonomic diversity are becoming available to generate molecular timetrees by using sophisticated methods that model rate variation among lineages. However, the practical application of these methods is challenging because of the exorbitant calculation times required by current methods for contemporary data sizes, the difficulty in correctly modeling the rate heterogeneity in highly diverse taxonomic groups, and the lack of reliable clock calibrations and their uncertainty distributions for most groups of species. Here, we present a method that estimates relative times of divergences for all branching points (nodes) in very large phylogenetic trees without assuming a specific model for lineage rate variation or specifying any clock calibrations. The method (RelTime) performed better than existing methods when applied to very large computer simulated datasets where evolutionary rates were varied extensively among lineages by following autocorrelated and uncorrelated models. On average, RelTime completed calculations 1,000 times faster than the fastest Bayesian method, with even greater speed difference for larger number of sequences. This speed and accuracy will enable molecular dating analysis of very large datasets. Relative time estimates will be useful for determining the relative ordering and spacing of speciation events, identifying lineages with significantly slower or faster evolutionary rates, diagnosing the effect of selected calibrations on absolute divergence times, and estimating absolute times of divergence when highly reliable calibration points are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121 · Cited by 39,969
Self-citationPAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
Yang, Z. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm088 · Cited by 13,879
BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees
Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 · Cited by 12,919
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
Self-citationRambaut, A., & Grass, N. C. (1997) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235 · Cited by 1,574
Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification
Meredith, R. W., Janečka, J. E., Gatesy, J., Ryder, O. A., Fisher, C. A., Teeling, E. C., Goodbla, A., Eizirik, E., Simão, T. L. L., Stadler, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211028 · Cited by 1,464
Erwin, D. H., Laflamme, M., Tweedt, S. M., Sperling, E. A., Pisani, D., & Peterson, K. J. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206375 · Cited by 1,336
Cited by
MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., & Kumar, S. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst197 · Cited by 47,205
Self-citationMEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., & Tamura, K. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw054 · Cited by 44,059
Self-citationMEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab120 · Cited by 22,403
Self-citationAn evolutionary arms race between KRAB zinc-finger genes ZNF91/93 and SVA/L1 retrotransposons
Jacobs, F. M. J., Greenberg, D., Nguyen, N., Haeussler, M., Ewing, A. D., Katzman, S., Paten, B., Salama, S. R., & Haussler, D. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13760 · Cited by 506
Fast Dating Using Least-Squares Criteria and Algorithms
To, T.-H., Jung, M., Lycett, S., & Gascuel, O. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syv068 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamura, K., Battistuzzi, F. U., Billing-Ross, P., Murillo, O., Filipski, A., & Kumar, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-11-05
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 19333-19338
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1992566665
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1213199109
- The paper
- Tamura, K., Battistuzzi, F. U., Billing-Ross, P., Murillo, O., Filipski, A., & Kumar, S. (2012). Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213199109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.