The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant elicitor peptides are conserved signals regulating direct and indirect antiherbivore defense
Open accessAbstract
Insect-induced defenses occur in nearly all plants and are regulated by conserved signaling pathways. As the first described plant peptide signal, systemin regulates antiherbivore defenses in the Solanaceae, but in other plant families, peptides with analogous activity have remained elusive. In the current study, we demonstrate that a member of the maize ( Zea mays ) plant elicitor peptide (Pep) family, ZmPep3, regulates responses against herbivores. Consistent with being a signal, expression of the ZmPROPEP3 precursor gene is rapidly induced by Spodoptera exigua oral secretions. At concentrations starting at 5 pmol per leaf, ZmPep3 stimulates production of jasmonic acid, ethylene, and increased expression of genes encoding proteins associated with herbivory defense. These include proteinase inhibitors and biosynthetic enzymes for production of volatile terpenes and benzoxazinoids. In accordance with gene expression data, plants treated with ZmPep3 emit volatiles similar to those from plants subjected to herbivory. ZmPep3-treated plants also exhibit induced accumulation of the benzoxazinoid phytoalexin 2-hydroxy-4,7-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one glucoside. Direct and indirect defenses induced by ZmPep3 contribute to resistance against S. exigua through significant reduction of larval growth and attraction of Cotesia marginiventris parasitoids. ZmPep3 activity is specific to Poaceous species; however, peptides derived from PROPEP orthologs identified in Solanaceous and Fabaceous plants also induce herbivory-associated volatiles in their respective species. These studies demonstrate that Peps are conserved signals across diverse plant families regulating antiherbivore defenses and are likely to be the missing functional homologs of systemin outside of the Solanaceae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interactions between Spinacia oleracea and Bradysia impatiens : A role for phytoecdysteroids
Schmelz, E. A., Grebenok, R. J., Ohnmeiss, T. E., & Bowers, W. S. (2002) · Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1002/arch.10062 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Cited by
Plant pattern-recognition receptors
Zipfel, C. (2014) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2014.05.004 · Cited by 1,159
Kant, M. R., Jonckheere, W., Knegt, B., Lemos, F., Liu, J., Schimmel, B. C. J., Villarroel, C. A., Ataide, L. M. S., Dermauw, W., Glas, J. J., et al. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv054 · Cited by 360
Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern-Triggered Immunity in Plants
Hou, S., Liu, Z., Shen, H., & Wu, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00646 · Cited by 312
Cues from chewing insects — the intersection of DAMPs, HAMPs, MAMPs and effectors
Acevedo, F. E., Rivera-Vega, L. J., Chung, S. H., Ray, S., & Felton, G. W. (2015) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.029 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Huffaker, A., Pearce, G., Veyrat, N., Erb, M., Turlings, T. C. J., Sartor, R., Shen, Z., Briggs, S. P., Vaughan, M. M., Alborn, H. T., Teal, P. E. A., & Schmelz, E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-03-18
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5707-5712
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2148616187
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant elicitor peptides are conserved signals regulating direct and indirect antiherbivore defense. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1214668110
- The paper
- Huffaker, A., Pearce, G., Veyrat, N., Erb, M., Turlings, T. C. J., Sartor, R., Shen, Z., Briggs, S. P., Vaughan, M. M., Alborn, H. T., Teal, P. E. A., & Schmelz, E. A. (2013). Plant elicitor peptides are conserved signals regulating direct and indirect antiherbivore defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214668110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.