The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services
Open accessAbstract
Despite broad recognition of the value of the goods and services provided by nature, existing tools for assessing and valuing ecosystem services often fall short of the needs and expectations of decision makers. Here we address one of the most important missing components in the current ecosystem services toolbox: a comprehensive and generalizable framework for describing and valuing water quality-related services. Water quality is often misrepresented as a final ecosystem service. We argue that it is actually an important contributor to many different services, from recreation to human health. We present a valuation approach for water quality-related services that is sensitive to different actions that affect water quality, identifies aquatic endpoints where the consequences of changing water quality on human well-being are realized, and recognizes the unique groups of beneficiaries affected by those changes. We describe the multiple biophysical and economic pathways that link actions to changes in water quality-related ecosystem goods and services and provide guidance to researchers interested in valuing these changes. Finally, we present a valuation template that integrates biophysical and economic models, links actions to changes in service provision and value estimates, and considers multiple sources of water quality-related ecosystem service values without double counting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., & Burkholder, J. M. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804901 · Cited by 2,965
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389 · cited 1×
“These models have been used to estimate the water quality consequences of future land use scenarios (12) or the effectiveness of conservation policies (13).”
MethodSelf-citationWhat are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 · Cited by 2,143
Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus
Heisler, J., Glibert, P. M., Burkholder, J. M., Anderson, D. M., Cochlan, W., Dennison, W. C., Dortch, Q., Gobler, C. J., Heil, C. A., Humphries, E., et al. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.006 · Cited by 2,090
Eutrophication of U.S. Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages
Dodds, W. K., Bouska, W. W., Eitzmann, J. L., Pilger, T. J., Pitts, K. L., Riley, A. J., Schloesser, J. T., & Thornbrugh, D. J. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801217q · Cited by 1,576
The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services
Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758 · Cited by 1,433
Self-citationSWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling
Arnold, J. G., & Fohrer, N. (2005) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.5611 · Cited by 1,336
Cited by
Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
Guerry, A. D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G. C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I. J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1503751112 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationAssessing water ecosystem services for water resource management
Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008 · Cited by 580
Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade
Walsh, J. R., Carpenter, S. R., & Vander Zanden, M. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1600366113 · Cited by 532
Meli, P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Balvanera, P., & Martínez Ramos, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093507 · Cited by 289
The biodiversity‐dependent ecosystem service debt
Isbell, F., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Loreau, M. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12393 · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeler, B. L., Polasky, S., Brauman, K. A., Johnson, K. A., Finlay, J. C., O’Neill, A., Kovacs, K., & Dalzell, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-09-27
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 18619-18624
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1997333234
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1215991109
- The paper
- Keeler, B. L., Polasky, S., Brauman, K. A., Johnson, K. A., Finlay, J. C., O’Neill, A., Kovacs, K., & Dalzell, B. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215991109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
