Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53—alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer

Open access
Smith, Gillian, Carey, Francis A., Beattie, Julie, Wilkie, Murray J. V., Lightfoot, Tracy J., Coxhead, Jonathan, Garner, R. Colin, Steele, Robert J. C., Wolf, C. Roland·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most significant causes of cancer death. A genetic model for colorectal cancer has been proposed in which the sequential accumulation of mutations in specific genes, including adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), Kirsten-ras (K-ras), and p53, drives the transition from healthy colonic epithelia through increasingly dysplastic adenoma to colorectal cancer. We have characterized tumor mutation spectra in a large cohort of colorectal cancer patients. In marked contrast to the predictions of the sequential model of mutation accumulation, only 6.6% of tumors were found to contain mutations in APC, K-ras, and p53, with 38.7% of tumors containing mutations in only one of these genes. The most common combination of mutations was p53 and APC (27.1%), whereas mutations in both p53 and K-ras were extremely rare. Statistical analysis (two-sided Fisher's exact test) confirmed that mutations in K-ras and p53 co-occurred less frequently than expected by chance ( P < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). This finding suggests that these mutations lie on alternate pathways of colorectal tumor development. The heterogeneous pattern of tumor mutations in our patient cohort suggests that multiple alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer exist and that the widely accepted genetic model of cancer development is not representative of the majority of colorectal tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.122612899

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Smith, G., Carey, F. A., Beattie, J., Wilkie, M. J. V., Lightfoot, T. J., Coxhead, J., Garner, R. C., Steele, R. J. C., & Wolf, C. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-07
Volume
99
Issue
14
Pages
9433-9438
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2010875436
Cited by
521
References
2
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53—alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.122612899
The paper
Smith, G., Carey, F. A., Beattie, J., Wilkie, M. J. V., Lightfoot, T. J., Coxhead, J., Garner, R. C., Steele, R. J. C., & Wolf, C. R. (2002). Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53—alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122612899

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.