Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 722

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum

Open access
Kambara, T, Simms, L A, Whitehall, V L J, Spring, K J, Wynter, C V A, Walsh, M D, Barker, M A, Arnold, S, McGivern, A, Matsubara, N, Tanaka, N, Higuchi, T, Young, J, Jass, J R, Leggett, B A·2004·Gut

Abstract

Background and aims: Mutations in BRAF have been linked with colorectal cancers (CRC) showing high level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). However, the distribution of BRAF mutations in MSI-H cancers remains to be clarified with respect to precursor lesions and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Methods: Forty three hyperplastic polyps (HP), nine mixed polyps (MP), five serrated adenomas (SA), 28 conventional adenomas (AD), 18 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC), and 127 sporadic CRC (46 MSI-H and 81 non-MSI-H) were collected from patients undergoing colectomy for either CRC or hyperplastic polyposis. Twenty five of 57 serrated lesions were derived from four patients with hyperplastic polyposis. HP were further subdivided according to recently documented morphological criteria into 27 classical HP and 16 variant lesions described as “sessile serrated adenoma” (SSA). All tumours were screened for BRAF activating mutations. Results: The BRAF mutation was more frequent in SSA (75%) and MP (89%) than in classical HP (19%), SA (20%), and AD (0%) (p<0.0001), and also in sporadic MSI-H cancers (76%) compared with HNPCC (0%) and sporadic non-MSI-H cancers (9%) (p<0.0001). The BRAF mutation was identified more often in CIMP-high serrated polyps (72%) and CIMP-high CRC (77%) than in CIMP-low (30%) and CIMP-negative (13%) polyps (p = 0.002) as well as CIMP-low (18%) and CIMP-negative (0%) CRC (p<0.0001). Conclusions: The BRAF mutation was frequently seen in SSA and in sporadic MSI-H CRC, both of which were associated with DNA methylation. Sporadic MSI-H cancers may originate in SSA and not adenomas, and BRAF mutation and DNA methylation are early events in this “serrated” pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2003.037671

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 722

Metadata

Authors
Kambara, T., Simms, L. A., Whitehall, V. L. J., Spring, K. J., Wynter, C. V. A., Walsh, M. D., Barker, M. A., Arnold, S., McGivern, A., Matsubara, N., Tanaka, N., Higuchi, T., Young, J., Jass, J. R., & Leggett, B. A.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-07-09
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
1137-1144
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2120099188
Cited by
722
References
5
FWCI
24.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2003.037671
The paper
Kambara, T., Simms, L. A., Whitehall, V. L. J., Spring, K. J., Wynter, C. V. A., Walsh, M. D., Barker, M. A., Arnold, S., McGivern, A., Matsubara, N., Tanaka, N., Higuchi, T., Young, J., Jass, J. R., & Leggett, B. A. (2004). BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2003.037671

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.