The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants
Open accessAbstract
The importance of gene gain through duplication has long been appreciated. In contrast, the importance of gene loss has only recently attracted attention. Indeed, studies in organisms ranging from plants to worms and humans suggest that duplication of some genes might be better tolerated than that of others. Here we have undertaken a large-scale study to investigate the existence of duplication-resistant genes in the sequenced genomes of 20 flowering plants. We demonstrate that there is a large set of genes that is convergently restored to single-copy status following multiple genome-wide and smaller scale duplication events. We rule out the possibility that such a pattern could be explained by random gene loss only and therefore propose that there is selection pressure to preserve such genes as singletons. This is further substantiated by the observation that angiosperm single-copy genes do not comprise a random fraction of the genome, but instead are often involved in essential housekeeping functions that are highly conserved across all eukaryotes. Furthermore, single-copy genes are generally expressed more highly and in more tissues than non–single-copy genes, and they exhibit higher sequence conservation. Finally, we propose different hypotheses to explain their resistance against duplication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992
Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi
Wapinski, I., Pfeffer, A., Friedman, N., & Regev, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06107 · Cited by 614
Cited by
Albalat, R., & Cañestro, C. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · Cited by 775
Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants
Cheng, F., Wu, J., Cai, X., Liang, J., Freeling, M., & Wang, X. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7 · Cited by 398
Impact of whole‐genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms
Landis, J. B., Soltis, D. E., Li, Z., Marx, H. E., Barker, M. S., Tank, D. C., & Soltis, P. S. (2018) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/ajb2.1060 · Cited by 359
Wendel, J. F., Lisch, D., Hu, G., & Mason, A. S. (2018) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2018.01.004 · Cited by 247
Synteny-Guided Resolution of Gene Trees Clarifies the Functional Impact of Whole-Genome Duplications
Parey, E., Louis, A., Cabau, C., Guiguen, Y., Roest Crollius, H., & Berthelot, C. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa149 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- De Smet, R., Adams, K. L., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C. E., Maere, S., & Van de Peer, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-02-04
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2898-2903
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2035628732
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 39.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1300127110
- The paper
- De Smet, R., Adams, K. L., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C. E., Maere, S., & Van de Peer, Y. (2013). Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300127110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.