Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Giant surfactants provide a versatile platform for sub-10-nm nanostructure engineering

Open access
Yu, Xinfei, Yue, Kan, Hsieh, I-Fan, Li, Yiwen, Dong, Xue-Hui, Liu, Chang, Xin, Yu, Wang, Hsiao-Fang, Shi, An-Chang, Newkome, George R., Ho, Rong-Ming, Chen, Er-Qiang, Zhang, Wen-Bin, Cheng, Stephen Z. D.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The engineering of structures across different length scales is central to the design of novel materials with controlled macroscopic properties. Herein, we introduce a unique class of self-assembling materials, which are built upon shape- and volume-persistent molecular nanoparticles and other structural motifs, such as polymers, and can be viewed as a size-amplified version of the corresponding small-molecule counterparts. Among them, “giant surfactants” with precise molecular structures have been synthesized by “clicking” compact and polar molecular nanoparticles to flexible polymer tails of various composition and architecture at specific sites. Capturing the structural features of small-molecule surfactants but possessing much larger sizes, giant surfactants bridge the gap between small-molecule surfactants and block copolymers and demonstrate a duality of both materials in terms of their self-assembly behaviors. The controlled structural variations of these giant surfactants through precision synthesis further reveal that their self-assemblies are remarkably sensitive to primary chemical structures, leading to highly diverse, thermodynamically stable nanostructures with feature sizes around 10 nm or smaller in the bulk, thin-film, and solution states, as dictated by the collective physical interactions and geometric constraints. The results suggest that this class of materials provides a versatile platform for engineering nanostructures with sub-10-nm feature sizes. These findings are not only scientifically intriguing in understanding the chemical and physical principles of the self-assembly, but also technologically relevant, such as in nanopatterning technology and microelectronics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1302606110

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Yu, X., Yue, K., Hsieh, I.-F., Li, Y., Dong, X.-H., Liu, C., Xin, Y., Wang, H.-F., Shi, A.-C., Newkome, G. R., Ho, R.-M., Chen, E.-Q., Zhang, W.-B., & Cheng, S. Z. D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-05-28
Volume
110
Issue
25
Pages
10078-10083
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2058138902
Cited by
220
References
3
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Giant surfactants provide a versatile platform for sub-10-nm nanostructure engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1302606110
The paper
Yu, X., Yue, K., Hsieh, I.-F., Li, Y., Dong, X.-H., Liu, C., Xin, Y., Wang, H.-F., Shi, A.-C., Newkome, G. R., Ho, R.-M., Chen, E.-Q., Zhang, W.-B., & Cheng, S. Z. D. (2013). Giant surfactants provide a versatile platform for sub-10-nm nanostructure engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302606110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.