Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human NAIP and mouse NAIP1 recognize bacterial type III secretion needle protein for inflammasome activation

Open access
Yang, Jieling, Zhao, Yue, Shi, Jianjin, Shao, Feng·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Our analyses uncover general immunogenic activity of bacterial T3SS needle protein and identify human NAIP and mouse NAIP1 as cytosolic innate immune sensors of bacterial T3SS needle protein. These results, together with our previous studies, establish a complete framework for understanding NLRC4-mediated detection of bacterial virulence products by the NAIP family inflammasome receptors. The inflammasome-stimulating activity of bacterial T3SS needle proteins and the difference between mouse and human NAIP inflammasome also may provide guidance in vaccine development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1306376110

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Yang, J., Zhao, Y., Shi, J., & Shao, F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-08-12
Volume
110
Issue
35
Pages
14408-14413
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1975145629
Cited by
414
References
2
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.