The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose
Open accessAbstract
Plant cell-wall polysaccharides represent a vast source of food in nature. To depolymerize polysaccharides to soluble sugars, many organisms use multifunctional enzyme mixtures consisting of glycoside hydrolases, lytic polysaccharide mono-oxygenases, polysaccharide lyases, and carbohydrate esterases, as well as accessory, redox-active enzymes for lignin depolymerization. Many of these enzymes that degrade lignocellulose are multimodular with carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) and catalytic domains connected by flexible, glycosylated linkers. These linkers have long been thought to simply serve as a tether between structured domains or to act in an inchworm-like fashion during catalytic action. To examine linker function, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the Trichoderma reesei Family 6 and Family 7 cellobiohydrolases ( Tr Cel6A and Tr Cel7A, respectively) bound to cellulose. During these simulations, the glycosylated linkers bind directly to cellulose, suggesting a previously unknown role in enzyme action. The prediction from the MD simulations was examined experimentally by measuring the binding affinity of the Cel7A CBM and the natively glycosylated Cel7A CBM-linker. On crystalline cellulose, the glycosylated linker enhances the binding affinity over the CBM alone by an order of magnitude. The MD simulations before and after binding of the linker also suggest that the bound linker may affect enzyme action due to significant damping in the enzyme fluctuations. Together, these results suggest that glycosylated linkers in carbohydrate-active enzymes, which are intrinsically disordered proteins in solution, aid in dynamic binding during the enzymatic deconstruction of plant cell walls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Dynamic Allostery: Linkers Are Not Merely Flexible
Ma, B., Tsai, C.-J., Haliloğlu, T., & Nussinov, R. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.06.002 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Payne, C. M., Resch, M. G., Chen, L., Crowley, M. F., Himmel, M. E., Taylor, L. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., Stals, I., Tan, Z., & Beckham, G. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-08-19
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 14646-14651
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2049470922
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1309106110
- The paper
- Payne, C. M., Resch, M. G., Chen, L., Crowley, M. F., Himmel, M. E., Taylor, L. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., Stals, I., Tan, Z., & Beckham, G. T. (2013). Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309106110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.