The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Integrated pest management (IPM) has been the dominant crop protection paradigm promoted globally since the 1960s. However, its adoption by developing country farmers is surprisingly low. This article reports 51 potential reasons why, identified and prioritized by hundreds of IPM professionals and practitioners around the world. Stakeholders from developing countries prioritized different adoption obstacles than those from high-income countries. Surprisingly, a few of the obstacles prioritized in developing countries appear to be overlooked by the literature. We suggest that a more vigorous analysis and discussion of the factors discouraging IPM adoption in developing countries may accelerate the progress needed to bring about its full potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown the validity of using this platform to conduct surveys used in academic research, in addition to the numerous studies which use such platforms for conducting surveys globally56–60.”
From Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,583
Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4047 · Cited by 5,622
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control
Levins, R. (1969) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/15.3.237 · Cited by 3,564
Social Capital and the Environment
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00098-x · Cited by 1,764
Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources
Pretty, J. (2003) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1126/science.1090847 · Cited by 1,756
An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation
Trochim, W. M. K. (1989) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5 · Cited by 1,512
Integrated Pest Management: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Developments
Kogan, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.243 · Cited by 1,363
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- ; World Bank Sustainable Pest Management: Achievements and Challenges, Report 32 714–GBL (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005).
- LP Pedigo, Closing the gap between IPM theory and practice. J Agric Entomol 12, 171–181 (1995).
- Nowak P Padgett S Hoban TJ (1996) Practical considerations in assessing barriers to IPM adoption. Proceedings of the Third National IPM Symposium: Broadening Support for 21st Century IPM . ERS Miscellaneous Publication (Citeseer Washington DC) pp 93–114.
- AJ Dreves, Village-level integrated pest management in developing countries. J Agric Entomol 13, 195–211 (1996).
- ; International Fund for Agricultural Development Rural Poverty Report 2011 (IFAD, Rome, 2010).
- DG Bottrell Integrated Pest Management (Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, 1979).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review
Deguine, J., Aubertot, J., Flor, R. J., Lescourret, F., Wyckhuys, K. A. G., & Ratnadass, A. (2021) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w · Cited by 853
Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
Pretty, J., & Bharucha, Z. P. (2015) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects6010152 · Cited by 768
Potatoes for Sustainable Global Food Security
Devaux, A., Kromann, P., & Ortiz, O. (2014) · Potato Research · doi:10.1007/s11540-014-9265-1 · Cited by 472
The New Integrated Pest Management Paradigm for the Modern Age
Dara, S. K. (2019) · Journal of Integrated Pest Management · doi:10.1093/jipm/pmz010 · Cited by 451
Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives
Campos, E. V. R., Proença, P. L. F., Oliveira, J. L., Bakshi, M., Abhilash, P. C., & Fraceto, L. F. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.038 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsa, S., Morse, S., Bonifacio, A., Chancellor, T. C. B., Condori, B., Crespo-Pérez, V., Hobbs, S. L. A., Kroschel, J., Ba, M. N., Rebaudo, F., Sherwood, S. G., Vanek, S. J., Faye, E., Herrera, M. A., & Dangles, O.
- Affiliations
- International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Fundación para la Promoción e Investigación de Productos Andinos, Cochabamba, Bolivia;
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- International Potato Center (PE)
- Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador;
- CAB International (GB)
- International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropic, Niamey, Niger;
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Cornell University (US)
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Unité Diversité, Évolution et Écologie des Insectes Tropicaux, Laboratoire Evolution, Génomes et Spéciation, 91198 Gif-sur Yvette Cedex, France;
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (EC)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2014-02-24
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3889-3894
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3956194
- OpenAlex
- W2099625864
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 64.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (acceptedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- McKnight Foundation
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
- Keywords
- integrated pest management, IPM adoption, barriers to adoption, developing countries, agricultural extension, stakeholder engagement, concept mapping
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Analysis of Variance, Community-Institutional Relations, Data Collection, Developing Countries, Education, Motivation, Pest Control, Professional Competence, Research, Cluster Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
