The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology
Open accessAbstract
Significance: This paper provides a synthesis of results from experimental studies on plants and animals, and shows that there is strong evidence that genotypic and heritable phenotypic diversity improves establishment success and population persistence. An increased focus on among-individual variation may improve the success of conservation programs aiming to revitalize declining populations and species. Recognizing the role of diversity may also improve our ability to identify and ultimately prevent potential harmful invading species from spreading outside of their native ranges, and aid the development of means for improved protection against epizootics and epidemics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-2-174_4 · Cited by 7,746
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
Levins, R. (1968) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691209418 · Cited by 5,302
Introduction to conservation genetics
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1529 · Cited by 3,509
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
LEVINS, R. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbbh · Cited by 3,383
The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J. A., Yang, L. H., Davis, J. M., Hulsey, C. D., & Forister, M. L. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343878 · Cited by 2,762
The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P., & Blackburn, T. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.004 · Cited by 2,571
Cited by
Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species
Forsman, A. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.92 · Cited by 481
Self-citationWhat we still don't know about invasion genetics
Bock, D. G., Caseys, C., Cousens, R. D., Hahn, M. A., Heredia, S. M., Hübner, S., Turner, K. G., Whitney, K. D., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13032 · Cited by 441
Biological invasions, climate change and genomics
Chown, S. L., Hodgins, K. A., Griffin, P. C., Oakeshott, J. G., Byrne, M., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2015) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12234 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsman, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-12-23
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 302-307
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2068396252
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 19.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1317745111
- The paper
- Forsman, A. (2014). Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317745111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
