Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemical cross-linking/mass spectrometry targeting acidic residues in proteins and protein complexes

Open access
Leitner, Alexander, Joachimiak, Lukasz A., Unverdorben, Pia, Walzthoeni, Thomas, Frydman, Judith, Förster, Friedrich, Aebersold, Ruedi·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Most proteins carry out their function by associating with other proteins in stable or transient complexes. Structural analysis of such complexes, for example by crystallography, is frequently performed to study their function or mode of action. However, many large complexes are refractory to traditional structural biology methods. Alternative methods have been developed that are often combined with computational methods in hybrid structural biology strategies. Among these, the combination of chemical cross-linking and MS (XL-MS) has shown to be particularly informative. Current XL-MS methods mainly rely on the coupling of lysine residues. Here we describe a chemistry to cross-link acidic residues that generates structural information complementary to that obtained by amine-specific cross-linking, thus significantly expanding the scope of XL-MS analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1320298111

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Leitner, A., Joachimiak, L. A., Unverdorben, P., Walzthoeni, T., Frydman, J., Förster, F., & Aebersold, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-06-17
Volume
111
Issue
26
Pages
9455-9460
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2168248466
Cited by
263
References
1
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.