Cited by 73Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Pelvic girdle and fin of Tiktaalik roseae

Open access
Shubin, Neil H., Daeschler, Edward B., Jenkins, Farish A.·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The earliest tetrapods have robust limbs, particularly hind limbs that are enlarged and supported by a number of modifications to the pelvic girdle. In contrast, the closest relatives of tetrapods maintain small and weakly ossified pelvic appendages as compared with the pectorals. This observation has led to the “front wheel drive” hypothesis that held that the closest relatives of tetrapods emphasized pectoral support and locomotion whereas significant pelvic support and locomotion was a tetrapod innovation. The discovery of pelvic girdle and fin material of the tetrapodomorph Tiktaalik roseae reveals a transitional stage in the origin of the pelvic girdle and appendage: although retaining primitive skeletal architecture, these elements are enhanced in size and robusticity much like tetrapods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1322559111

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geological and anatomical evidence is strongly indicative that Tiktaalik was an animal interacting with the substrate in an aquatic context.

    “Geological and anatomical evidence is strongly indicative that Tiktaalik was an animal interacting with the substrate in an aquatic context (12, 42, 43).”

    From Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition (2020) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B., & Jenkins, F. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-01-13
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
893-899
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2080616404
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
pelvic girdle, pelvic fin, tetrapod evolution, fin-to-limb transition, acetabulum, fin rays
MeSH terms
Amphibians, Animals, Canada, Biological Evolution, Fishes, Fossils, Paleontology, Pelvis, Species Specificity, Vertebrates, Animal Fins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review