Pelvic girdle and fin of Tiktaalik roseae
Open accessAbstract
Significance: The earliest tetrapods have robust limbs, particularly hind limbs that are enlarged and supported by a number of modifications to the pelvic girdle. In contrast, the closest relatives of tetrapods maintain small and weakly ossified pelvic appendages as compared with the pectorals. This observation has led to the “front wheel drive” hypothesis that held that the closest relatives of tetrapods emphasized pectoral support and locomotion whereas significant pelvic support and locomotion was a tetrapod innovation. The discovery of pelvic girdle and fin material of the tetrapodomorph Tiktaalik roseae reveals a transitional stage in the origin of the pelvic girdle and appendage: although retaining primitive skeletal architecture, these elements are enhanced in size and robusticity much like tetrapods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Geological and anatomical evidence is strongly indicative that Tiktaalik was an animal interacting with the substrate in an aquatic context.
“Geological and anatomical evidence is strongly indicative that Tiktaalik was an animal interacting with the substrate in an aquatic context (12, 42, 43).”
From Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan
Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., & Jenkins, F. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04639 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fin ray patterns at the fin-to-limb transition
Stewart, T. A., Lemberg, J. B., Taft, N. K., Yoo, I., Daeschler, E. B., & Shubin, N. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1915983117 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Geological and anatomical evidence is strongly indicative that Tiktaalik was an animal interacting with the substrate in an aquatic context (12, 42, 43).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B., & Jenkins, F. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Drexel University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Shubin, Neil H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2014-01-13
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 893-899
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3903263
- OpenAlex
- W2080616404
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- pelvic girdle, pelvic fin, tetrapod evolution, fin-to-limb transition, acetabulum, fin rays
- MeSH terms
- Amphibians, Animals, Canada, Biological Evolution, Fishes, Fossils, Paleontology, Pelvis, Species Specificity, Vertebrates, Animal Fins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review