The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I
Open accessAbstract
We present a system for random mutagenesis in Escherichia coli for the evolution of targeted genes. To increase error rates of DNA polymerase I (Pol I) replication, we introduced point mutations in three structural domains that govern Pol I fidelity. Expression of error-prone Pol I in vivo results in strong mutagenesis of a target sequence encoded in a Pol I-dependent plasmid (8.1 × 10 – 4 mutations per bp, an 80,000-fold increase), with a preference for plasmid relative to chromosome sequence. Mutagenesis is maximal in cultures maintained at stationary phase. Mutations are evenly distributed and show a variety of base pair substitutions, predominantly transitions. Mutagenesis extends at least 3 kb beyond the 400–500 nt reportedly synthesized by Pol I. We demonstrate that our error-prone Pol I can be used to generate enzymes with distinct properties by generating TEM-1 β-lactamase mutants able to hydrolyze a third-generation lactam antibiotic, aztreonam. Three different mutations contribute to aztreonam resistance. Two are found in the extended-spectrum β-lactamases most frequently identified in clinical isolates, and the third (G276R) has not been previously described. Our system of targeted mutagenesis in E. coli should have an impact on enzyme-based applications in areas such as synthetic chemistry, gene therapy, and molecular biology. Given the structural conservation between polymerases, this work should also provide a reference for altering the fidelity of other polymerases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kunkel, T. A., & Bebenek, K. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.497 · Cited by 1,003
Cited by
Methods for the directed evolution of proteins
Packer, M. S., & Liu, D. R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3927 · Cited by 991
Bacterial Resistance to β-Lactam Antibiotics: Compelling Opportunism, Compelling Opportunity
Fisher, J. F., Meroueh, S. O., & Mobashery, S. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030102i · Cited by 913
A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules
Esvelt, K. M., Carlson, J. C., & Liu, D. R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09929 · Cited by 699
Mutation as a Stress Response and the Regulation of Evolvability
Galhardo, R. S., Hastings, P. J., & Rosenberg, S. M. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230701648502 · Cited by 643
Ponder, R. G., Fonville, N. C., & Rosenberg, S. M. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.025 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Camps, M., Naukkarinen, J., Johnson, B. P., & Loeb, L. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-08-08
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9727-9732
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2017738521
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1333928100
- The paper
- Camps, M., Naukkarinen, J., Johnson, B. P., & Loeb, L. A. (2003). Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1333928100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.