Cited by 170Fire effects on ecosystemsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest Management and Policy

Resistance of the boreal forest to high burn rates

Open access
Héon, Jessie, Arseneault, Dominique, Parisien, Marc-André·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Climate change is expected to drastically increase both fire size and the frequency of large-fire years in the North American boreal forest, with consequent effects on forest ecosystems and carbon stocks. However, the influence of fire size and time since previous fire on fire activity is poorly understood because of incomplete records of past fire overlaps. Here we reconstruct the length of overlapping fires during the last 200 years along a 190-km transect and provide direct field evidence that extreme burn rates can be sustained by occasional droughts triggering immense fires. Fire occurrence in the most fire-prone regions of the North American boreal forest is, however, already fuel-limited and will resist further climate change because of overabundant young forest stands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1409316111

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some ecosystems demonstrate negative fire-vegetation feedbacks, whereby fire temporarily reduces fuel loading or flammability, which decreases the probability of repeat burning for a period of years to several decades.

    “Some ecosystems demonstrate negative fire-vegetation feedbacks, whereby fire temporarily reduces fuel loading or flammability, which decreases the probability of repeat burning for a period of years to several decades (Figure 3).Such feedbacks are evident in boreal forests and several types of temperate coniferous forest (Heon, Arseneault, & Parisien, 2014;Parks et al., 2015).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Heon, Arseneault, & Parisien, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Héon, J., Arseneault, D., & Parisien, M.-A.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA)
  • Canadian Forest Service (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-09-08
Volume
111
Issue
38
Pages
13888-13893
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1975910192
Cited by
170
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
boreal forest, forest fires, burning rate, fire size, fire recurrence, drought, young forest stands, fire regime reconstruction, climate change projections
MeSH terms
Carbon, Fires, North America, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review