Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 773

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean

Open access
Malviya, Shruti, Scalco, Eleonora, Audic, Stéphane, Vincent, Flora, Veluchamy, Alaguraj, Poulain, Julie, Wincker, Patrick, Iudicone, Daniele, de Vargas, Colomban, Bittner, Lucie, Zingone, Adriana, Bowler, Chris·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Diatoms, considered one of the most diverse and ecologically important phytoplanktonic groups, contribute around 20% of global primary productivity. They are particularly abundant in nutrient-rich coastal ecosystems and at high latitudes. Here, we have explored the dataset generated by Tara Oceans from a wide range of oceanic regions to characterize diatom diversity patterns on a global scale. We confirm the dominance of diatoms as a major photosynthetic group and identify the most widespread and diverse genera. We also provide a new estimate of marine planktonic diatom diversity and a global view of their distribution in the world’s ocean.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1509523113

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Malviya, S., Scalco, E., Audic, S., Vincent, F., Veluchamy, A., Poulain, J., Wincker, P., Iudicone, D., de Vargas, C., Bittner, L., Zingone, A., & Bowler, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
E1516-25
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2290413657
Cited by
773
References
3
FWCI
47.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.