The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA replication meets genetic exchange: Chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination
Open accessAbstract
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Colloquium on the roles of homologous recombination in DNA replication are summarized. Current findings in experimental systems ranging from bacteriophages to mammalian cell lines substantiate the idea that homologous recombination is a system supporting DNA replication when either the template DNA is damaged or the replication machinery malfunctions. There are several lines of supporting evidence: ( i ) DNA replication aggravates preexisting DNA damage, which then blocks subsequent replication; ( ii ) replication forks abandoned by malfunctioning replisomes become prone to breakage; ( iii ) mutants with malfunctioning replisomes or with elevated levels of DNA damage depend on homologous recombination; and ( iv ) homologous recombination primes DNA replication in vivo and can restore replication fork structures in vitro . The mechanisms of recombinational repair in bacteriophage T4, Escherichia coli , and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are compared. In vitro properties of the eukaryotic recombinases suggest a bigger role for single-strand annealing in the eukaryotic recombinational repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mechanistic basis for Mre11-directed DNA joining at microhomologies
Paull, T. T., & Gellert, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.110144297 · Cited by 188
Cited by
Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective
Wang, J. C. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm831 · Cited by 2,353
Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer
Vilenchik, M. M., & Knudson, A. G. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2135498100 · Cited by 717
RecBCD Enzyme and the Repair of Double-Stranded DNA Breaks
Dillingham, M. S., & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00020-08 · Cited by 586
SSB as an Organizer/Mobilizer of Genome Maintenance Complexes
Shereda, R. D., Kozlov, A. G., Lohman, T. M., Cox, M. M., & Keck, J. L. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230802341296 · Cited by 553
The Bacterial RecA Protein and the Recombinational DNA Repair of Stalled Replication Forks
Lusetti, S. L., & Cox, M. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.133940 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuzminov, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-07-17
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8461-8468
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2116619309
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA replication meets genetic exchange: Chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.151260698
- The paper
- Kuzminov, A. (2001). DNA replication meets genetic exchange: Chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.151260698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.