Cited by 882Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsTree-ring climate responses

Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe

Open access
Anderegg, William R. L., Klein, Tamir, Bartlett, Megan, Sack, Lawren, Pellegrini, Adam F. A., Choat, Brendan, Jansen, Steven·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Predicting the impacts of climate extremes on plant communities is a central challenge in ecology. Physiological traits may improve prediction of drought impacts on forests globally. We perform a meta-analysis across 33 studies that span all forested biomes and find that, among the examined traits, hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns in mortality from drought. Gymnosperm and angiosperm mortality was associated with different hydraulic traits, giving insight into the relative weights of different traits and mechanisms in mortality prediction. Our results provide a foundation for more mechanistic predictions of drought-induced tree mortality across Earth’s diverse forests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1525678113

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reactivation of telomerase activity or deletion of CDKN2A contributed to escape from HRAS G12V-induced or BRAF V600E-induced senescence programmes in various human cell types in culture.

    “For example, reactivation of telomerase activity or deletion of CDKN2A contributed to escape from HRAS G12V - induced or BRAF V600E -induced senescence programmes in various human cell types in culture 185 .”

    From Senescence and cancer — role and therapeutic opportunities (2022) · cites this paper as [185]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderegg, W. R. L., Klein, T., Bartlett, M., Sack, L., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Choat, B., & Jansen, S.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-04-18
Volume
113
Issue
18
Pages
5024-5029
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2337215722
Cited by
882
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF | BIO | Division of Environmental Biology (DEB EF-1340270, DEB-1249256)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_14753/1)
  • Australian Research Council (FT130101115)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
Keywords
drought-induced tree mortality, plant hydraulic traits, hydraulic safety margin, xylem water potential, flowering plants, gymnosperms, climate extremes, forest carbon sequestration, vegetation modeling
MeSH terms
Species Specificity, Stress, Physiological, Trees, Ecosystem, Plant Transpiration, Droughts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review