The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production
Open accessAbstract
Despite the increasing popularity of 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing (AM), the technique has not developed beyond the realm of rapid prototyping. This confinement of the field can be attributed to the inherent flaws of layer-by-layer printing and, in particular, anisotropic mechanical properties that depend on print direction, visible by the staircasing surface finish effect. Continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) is an alternative approach to AM that capitalizes on the fundamental principle of oxygen-inhibited photopolymerization to generate a continual liquid interface of uncured resin between the growing part and the exposure window. This interface eliminates the necessity of an iterative layer-by-layer process, allowing for continuous production. Herein we report the advantages of continuous production, specifically the fabrication of layerless parts. These advantages enable the fabrication of large overhangs without the use of supports, reduction of the staircasing effect without compromising fabrication time, and isotropic mechanical properties. Combined, these advantages result in multiple indicators of layerless and monolithic fabrication using CLIP technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Cited by
Advances in 4D Printing: Materials and Applications
Kuang, X., Roach, D. J., Wu, J., Hamel, C. M., Ding, Z., Wang, T., Dunn, M. L., & Qi, H. J. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201805290 · Cited by 1,095
Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine
Moroni, L., Burdick, J. A., Highley, C., Lee, S. J., Morimoto, Y., Takeuchi, S., & Yoo, J. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0006-y · Cited by 753
González-Henríquez, C. M., Sarabia-Vallejos, M. A., & Rodriguez-Hernandez, J. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001 · Cited by 562
Rapid, large-volume, thermally controlled 3D printing using a mobile liquid interface
Walker, D. A., Hedrick, J. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax1562 · Cited by 459
3D printing of functional microrobots
Li, J., & Pumera, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01062f · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Janusziewicz, R., Tumbleston, J. R., Quintanilla, A. L., Mecham, S. J., & DeSimone, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2016-09-26
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 11703-11708
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2524876416
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1605271113
- The paper
- Janusziewicz, R., Tumbleston, J. R., Quintanilla, A. L., Mecham, S. J., & DeSimone, J. M. (2016). Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605271113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.