Cited by 242Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationPluripotent Stem Cells Research

Enhancer priming by H3K4 methyltransferase MLL4 controls cell fate transition

Open access
Wang, Chaochen, Lee, Ji-Eun, Lai, Binbin, Macfarlan, Todd S., Xu, Shiliyang, Zhuang, Lenan, Liu, Chengyu, Peng, Weiqun +1 more·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Transcriptional enhancers control cell-identity gene expression and thus determine cell identity. Enhancers are primed by histone H3K4 mono-/di-methyltransferase MLL4 before they are activated by histone H3K27 acetyltransferase p300. Here, we show that MLL4 is dispensable for cell-identity maintenance but essential for cell fate transition using several model systems including embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation toward somatic cells and somatic cell reprogramming into ESC-like cells. Mechanistically, MLL4 is dispensable for maintaining p300 binding on active enhancers of cell-identity genes but is required for p300 binding on enhancers activated during cell fate transition. These results indicate that, although enhancer priming by MLL4 is dispensable for cell-identity maintenance, it controls cell fate transition by orchestrating p300-mediated enhancer activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1606857113

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies showed that the MLL4 complex recruits and activates p300 activity, involving UTX, at enhancers, resulting not only in methylation at H3K4 but also acetylation on H3K27 at target chromatin.

    “recent studies showed that the MLL4 complex recruits and activates p300 activity, involving UTX, at enhancers, resulting not only in methylation at H3K4 but also acetylation on H3K27 at target chromatin41,61.”

    From HNF4A guides the MLL4 complex to establish and maintain H3K4me1 at gene regulatory elements (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Significance section reports that MLL4 is required for p300 recruitment and H3K27ac deposition at de novo enhancers during embryonic stem-cell differentiation; the paper also identifies MLL4 as an H3K4 methyltransferase. Our copy does not show that UTX participates in this mechanism or that MLL4 activates p300's enzymatic activity, rather than enabling its recruitment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While MLL4 is required for cell fate transition, not all enhancers are primed prior to differentiation and MLL4 is not required for the maintenance of cell identity.

    “Interestingly, while MLL4 is required for cell fate transition, not all enhancers are primed prior to differentiation and MLL4 is not required for the maintenance of cell identity41.”
  • MLL4 serves as a main H3K4 mono-methyltransferase for enhancer activation and exhibits cell type and differentiation stage specific binding.

    “MLL4 serves as a main H3K4 mono-methyltransferase for enhancer activation35,36,38 and exhibits cell type and differentiation stage specific binding37,41.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [15]Ong CT, Corces VG (2011) Enhancer function: New insights into the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 12(4):283 -293.
  2. [16]Lam MT, Li W, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK (2014) Enhancer RNAs and regulated transcriptional programs. Trends Biochem Sci 39(4):170 -182.
  3. [17]Pasini D, Bracken AP, Hansen JB, Capillo M, Helin K (2007) The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 27(10): 3769 -3779.
  4. [18]Wang C, et al. (2012) UTX regulates mesoderm differentiation of embryonic stem cells independent of H3K27 demethylase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(38): 15324 -15329.
  5. [19]Keller GM (1995) In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7(6):862 -869.
  6. [20]Fehling HJ, et al. (2003) Tracking mesoderm induction and its specification to the hemangioblast during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Development 130(17): 4217 -4227.
  7. [21]Sommer CA, et al. (2010) Excision of reprogramming transgenes improves the differentiation potential of iPS cells generated with a single excisable vector. Stem Cells 28(1):64 -74.
  8. [22]Hussein SM, et al. (2014) Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency. Nature 516(7530):198 -206.
  9. [23]Denissov S, et al. (2014) Mll2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation on bivalent promoters in embryonic stem cells, whereas Mll1 is redundant. Development 141(3): 526 -537.
  10. [24]Zaidi S, et al. (2013) De novo mutations in histone-modifying genes in congenital heart disease. Nature 498(7453):220 -223.
  11. [25]Rao RC, Dou Y (2015) Hijacked in cancer: The KMT2 (MLL) family of methyltransferases. Nat Rev Cancer 15(6):334 -346.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Lee, J.-E., Lai, B., Macfarlan, T. S., Xu, S., Zhuang, L., Liu, C., Peng, W., & Ge, K.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-10-03
Volume
113
Issue
42
Pages
11871-11876
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2528171814
Cited by
242
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1ZIADK075003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
KMT2D, H3K4 methylation, P300, H3K27 acetylation, enhancer activation, cell fate transitions, cell identity genes, mouse embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, cellular reprogramming, self-renewal, MLL3, histone methyltransferase
MeSH terms
Cell Self Renewal, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, DNA-Binding Proteins, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Fibroblasts, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Models, Biological, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Biomarkers, E1A-Associated p300 Protein, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Gene Knockout Techniques, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review