Cited by 2,533Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression

Open access
Heintzman, Nathaniel D., Hon, Gary C., Hawkins, R. David, Kheradpour, Pouya, Stark, Alexander, Harp, Lindsey F., Ye, Zhen, Lee, Leonard K. +13 more·2009·Nature

Abstract

The human body is composed of diverse cell types with distinct functions. Although it is known that lineage specification depends on cell-specific gene expression, which in turn is driven by promoters, enhancers, insulators and other cis-regulatory DNA sequences for each gene, the relative roles of these regulatory elements in this process are not clear. We have previously developed a chromatin-immunoprecipitation-based microarray method (ChIP-chip) to locate promoters, enhancers and insulators in the human genome. Here we use the same approach to identify these elements in multiple cell types and investigate their roles in cell-type-specific gene expression. We observed that the chromatin state at promoters and CTCF-binding at insulators is largely invariant across diverse cell types. In contrast, enhancers are marked with highly cell-type-specific histone modification patterns, strongly correlate to cell-type-specific gene expression programs on a global scale, and are functionally active in a cell-type-specific manner. Our results define over 55,000 potential transcriptional enhancers in the human genome, significantly expanding the current catalogue of human enhancers and highlighting the role of these elements in cell-type-specific gene expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07829

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ChIPseq in human neurons identified at least four major transcriptional start sites within the SYNE1 locus, one of which, P3, lies immediately upstream of the p.L3206M mutation.

    “ChIPseq using antibodies to H3K4Me3, a mark associated with active promoter sites (Ernst et al., 2011), and to H3K27Ac, a mark associated with enhancer elements (Heintzman et al., 2009), demonstrated mapped read peaks corresponding to at least four major transcriptional start sites within the SYNE1 locus (P1–P4), one of which (P3) lies immediately upstream of the p.L3206M mutation (Figure 3E).”

    From Using Whole-Exome Sequencing to Identify Inherited Causes of Autism (2013) · cites this paper as Heintzman et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heintzman, N. D., Hon, G. C., Hawkins, R. D., Kheradpour, P., Stark, A., Harp, L. F., Ye, Z., Lee, L. K., Stuart, R. K., Ching, C. W., Ching, K. A., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. E., Liu, H., Zhang, X., Green, R. D., Lobanenkov, V. V., Stewart, R., Thomson, J. A., Crawford, G. E., Kellis, M., & Ren, B.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig Cancer Research (BE)
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
  • Morgridge Institute for Research (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Ren, Bing
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-03-18
Volume
459
Issue
7243
Pages
108-112
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2123564569
Cited by
2,533
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 171 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 154 · 2016: 164 · 2015: 183 · 2014: 193 · 2013: 204 · 2012: 188
FWCI
71.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG003151, R01HG004037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
histone modifications, enhancers, cell type-specific gene expression, promoter, insulators, CTCF binding, chromatin state, cis-regulatory elements, human cell lines, ChIP-chip
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Cell Line, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Chromatin, Gene Expression Regulation, HeLa Cells, Histones, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Genome, Human, K562 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review