Cited by 115Rheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesVibration Control and Rheological Fluids

Tunable shear thickening in suspensions

Open access
Lin, Neil Y.C., Ness, Christopher, Cates, Michael E., Sun, Jin, Cohen, Itai·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: When a concentrated suspension is strained, its viscosity can increase radically. This behavior, known as shear thickening, can be very useful to technological applications or highly problematic in industrial processes. Suspension flow properties are typically specified at the formulation stage, meaning that they are fixed in advance rather than controlled in situ during application. Here, we report a biaxial shear strategy eradicating the flow-induced structures responsible for thickening and tuning the suspension viscosity on demand during flow. This protocol enables us to regulate the thickening viscosity over 2 orders of magnitude. The tuning capability is a foundational step toward using dense suspensions in 3D printing, energy storage, and robotics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1608348113

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Speed-dependent behaviors can be dictated simply by the bifurcation geometry of the metamaterial.

    “While such complex speed-dependent phenomena are actively studied in materials (e.g., cornstarch46,47), our approach suggests that speed-dependent behaviors can be dictated simply by the bifurcation geometry of the metamaterial.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, N. Y. C., Ness, C., Cates, M. E., Sun, J., & Cohen, I.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-09-12
Volume
113
Issue
39
Pages
10774-10778
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2489359982
Cited by
115
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CBET-PMP No. 1232666, CBET-PMP No. 1509308, MRSEC program (DMR-1120296))
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N025318/1, EP/J007404)
  • Royal Society (EP/J007404)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Keywords
shear thickening, suspension, viscosity, shear rate, particle suspensions, shear thinning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review