The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The evolution of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus : Similarity of genetic backgrounds in historically early methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and contemporary epidemic clones
Open accessAbstract
The key genetic component of methicillin resistance, the mecA determinant, is not native to Staphylococcus aureus . Thus, the evolution of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) must have begun with the acquisition of the mecA determinant from an unknown heterologous source some time before the first reported appearance of MRSA isolates in clinical specimens in the U.K. and Denmark (in the early 1960s). We compared the genetic backgrounds and phenotypes of a group of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates to the properties of MRSA strains isolated in Denmark and the U.K. during the same time period, and also to the genetic profiles of contemporary epidemic clones of MRSA. All early MRSA isolates resembled a large group of the early MSSA blood isolates in phenotypic and genetic properties, including phage group, antibiotype (resistance to penicillin, streptomycin, and tetracycline), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern, and spaA type and multilocus sequence type, strongly suggesting that the early MSSA examined here represented the progeny of a strain that served as one of the first S. aureus recipients of the methicillin-resistance determinant in Europe. The genetic background of this group of early MSSA isolates was also very similar to that of the widely disseminated contemporary “Iberian clone” of MRSA, suggesting that genetic determinants present in early MSSA and essential for some aspects of the epidemicity and/or virulence of these strains may have been retained by this highly successful contemporary MRSA lineage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era
Chambers, H. F., & DeLeo, F. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200 · Cited by 2,718
Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus
Lowy, F. D. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci18535 · Cited by 1,445
Pathogenesis of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Gordon, R. J., & Lowy, F. D. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/533591 · Cited by 961
Multi-locus sequence typing: a tool for global epidemiology
Urwin, R., & Maiden, M. C. J. (2003) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2003.08.006 · Cited by 730
Oliveira, D. C., Tomasz, A., & de Lencastre, H. (2002) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00227-x · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crisóstomo, M. I., Westh, H., Tomasz, A., Chung, M., Oliveira, D. C., & de Lencastre, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-07-31
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9865-9870
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2142156014
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus : Similarity of genetic backgrounds in historically early methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and contemporary epidemic clones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.161272898
- The paper
- Crisóstomo, M. I., Westh, H., Tomasz, A., Chung, M., Oliveira, D. C., & de Lencastre, H. (2001). The evolution of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus : Similarity of genetic backgrounds in historically early methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and contemporary epidemic clones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.161272898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.