The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain
Open accessAbstract
What mechanisms underlie the flexible formation, adaptation, synchronization, and dissolution of large-scale neural assemblies from the 10 10 densely interconnected, continuously active neurons of the human brain? Nonlinear dynamics provides a unifying perspective on self-organization. It shows that the emergence of patterns in open, nonequilibrium systems is governed by their stability in response to small disturbances and predicts macroscopic transitions between patterns of differing stability. Here, we directly demonstrate that such transitions can be elicited in the human brain by interference at the neural level. As a probe, we used a classic motor coordination paradigm exhibiting well described movement states of differing stability. Functional neuroimaging identified premotor (PMA) and supplementary motor (SMA) cortices as having neural activity linked to the degree of behavioral instability. These regions then were transiently disturbed with graded transcranial magnetic stimulation, which caused sustained and macroscopic behavioral transitions from the less stable out-of-phase to the stable in-phase movement, whereas the stable pattern could not be affected. Moreover, the strength of the disturbance needed (a measure of neural stability) was linked to the degree of behavioral stability, demonstrating the applicability of nonlinear system theory as a powerful predictor of the dynamical repertoire of the human brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain
Hallett, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018000 · Cited by 1,603
Cited by
Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks
Bassett, D. S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T., & Bullmore, E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606005103 · Cited by 814
Self-citationTognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022 · Cited by 718
Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling
Lewis, M. D. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0500004x · Cited by 618
The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination
Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611453104 · Cited by 437
Unifying Large- and small-scale theories of coordination
Kelso, J. A. S. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23050537 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Ziemann, U., Hajak, G., Cohen, L., & Berman, K. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-07-31
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10948-10953
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2168640148
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.162114799
- The paper
- Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Ziemann, U., Hajak, G., Cohen, L., & Berman, K. F. (2002). Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.162114799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.