Cited by 349Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMycobacterium research and diagnosis

The role of Rel Mtb -mediated adaptation to stationary phase in long-term persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice

Open access
Dahl, John L., Kraus, Carl N., Boshoff, Helena I. M., Doan, Bernard, Foley, Korrie, Avarbock, David, Kaplan, Gilla, Mizrahi, Valerie +2 more·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Long-term survival of nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is ensured by the coordinated shutdown of active metabolism through a broad transcriptional program called the stringent response. In Mtb, this response is initiated by the enzymatic action of Rel Mtb and deletion of rel Mtb produces a strain (H37RvΔ rel Mtb ) severely compromised in the maintenance of long-term viability. Although aerosol inoculation of mice with H37RvΔ rel Mtb results in normal initial bacterial growth and containment, the ability of this strain to sustain chronic infection is severely impaired. Significant histopathologic differences were noted in lungs and spleens of mice infected with H37RvΔ rel Mtb compared with controls throughout the course of the infection. Microarray analysis revealed that H37RvΔ rel Mtb suffers from a generalized alteration of the transcriptional apparatus, as well as specific changes in the expression of virulence factors, cell-wall biosynthetic enzymes, heat shock proteins, and secreted antigens that may alter immune recognition of the recombinant organism. Thus, Rel Mtb is critical for the successful establishment of persistent infection in mice by altering the expression of antigenic and enzymatic factors that may contribute to successful latent infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1631248100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transcription of the FAS-I genes fas, accD4 and accD5 seems to correlate with growth.

    “The transcrip- tion of the FAS-​I genes fas, accD4 and accD5 seems to correlate with growth59,60,88.”

    From The mycobacterial cell envelope — a moving target (2020) · cites this paper as [88]

    The ‘Virulence factors and cell wall remodeling’ table (page not available) lists fas among genes with higher expression in wild-type bacteria than in the relA mutant. That supports a difference in fas expression, but the paper does not establish that its transcription correlates with growth, and the passages found for accD4 and accD5 do not mention either gene. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • mmaA2 and cmaA1, which catalyse the distal cis cyclopropanations on cis/cis-meromycolates, are downregulated by the stress regulator Rel or by starvation.

    “mmaA2 and cmaA1, which catalyse the distal cis cyclopropanations on cis/cis-​ meromycolates, are downregulated by the stress regula- tor Rel88 or by starvation59.”

    From The mycobacterial cell envelope — a moving target (2020) · cites this paper as [88]

    The table in “Virulence factors and cell wall remodeling” (page unavailable) lists mmaA2 as more highly expressed in the relA mutant, supporting Rel-associated downregulation of mmaA2. The passages do not establish the same effect for cmaA1 or describe either enzyme’s role in distal cis cyclopropanation. The separate starvation citation is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This change is likely partly mediated by the stress regulator Rel, which downregulates fbpA and fbpB and upregulates fbpC.

    “This change is likely partly mediated by the stress regulator Rel, which downregulates fbpA and fbpB and upregulates fbpC88.”

    From The mycobacterial cell envelope — a moving target (2020) · cites this paper as [88]

    In “Virulence factors and cell wall remodeling” (page unavailable), the table lists fbpB as higher in the Rel mutant and fbpC as higher in wild type, supporting the claimed directions for those genes. The discussion says antigen 85A is overexpressed in the mutant, consistent with the fbpA claim, but also says antigen 85C is overexpressed in the mutant—contrary to the table’s fbpC entry. The source is therefore internally inconsistent about fbpC. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Dannenberg, A. M. & Rook, G. A. (1994) in Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, Protection, and Control , ed. Bloom, B. R. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC), pp. 459-483.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahl, J. L., Kraus, C. N., Boshoff, H. I. M., Doan, B., Foley, K., Avarbock, D., Kaplan, G., Mizrahi, V., Rubin, H., & Barry, C. E.
Affiliations
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-08
Volume
100
Issue
17
Pages
10026-10031
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2008186432
Cited by
349
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI054338, Z01AI000783)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, stringent response, stationary phase adaptation, long-term persistence, chronic infection, transcriptional regulation, virulence factors, heat shock proteins, cell wall biosynthesis, secreted antigens, immune recognition, latent tuberculosis infection, aerosol infection, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Antigens, Bacterial, Female, Genes, Bacterial, Lung, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mutation, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Spleen, Time Factors, Protein Biosynthesis, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Tuberculosis, Splenic, Virulence, Colony Count, Microbial, Gene Expression, Gene Deletion, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review