Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential binding of NAD + and NADH allows the transcriptional corepressor carboxyl-terminal binding protein to serve as a metabolic sensor

Open access
Fjeld, Clark C., Birdsong, William T., Goodman, Richard H.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Carboxyl-terminal binding protein (CtBP) is a transcriptional corepressor originally identified through its ability to interact with adenovirus E1A. The finding that CtBP–E1A interactions were regulated by the nicotinamide adeninine dinucleotides NAD + and NADH raised the possibility that CtBP could serve as a nuclear redox sensor. This model requires differential binding affinities of NAD + and NADH, which has been controversial. The structure of CtBP determined by x-ray diffraction revealed a tryptophan residue adjacent to the proposed nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide binding site. We find that this tryptophan residue shows strong fluorescence resonance energy transfer to bound NADH. In this report, we take advantage of these findings to measure the dissociation constants for CtBP with NADH and NAD + . The affinity of NADH was determined by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The binding of NADH to protein is associated with an enhanced intensity of NADH fluorescence and a blue shift in its maximum. NAD + affinity was estimated by measuring the loss of the fluorescence blue shift as NADH dissociates on addition of NAD + . Our studies show a >100-fold higher affinity of NADH than NAD + , consistent with the proposed function of CtBP as a nuclear redox sensor. Moreover, the concentrations of NADH and NAD + required for half-maximal binding are approximately the same as their concentrations in the nuclear compartment. These findings support the possibility that changes in nuclear nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides could regulate the functions of CtBP in cell differentiation, development, or transformation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1633591100

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Fjeld, C. C., Birdsong, W. T., & Goodman, R. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-07-18
Volume
100
Issue
16
Pages
9202-9207
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2047109055
Cited by
312
References
3
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential binding of NAD + and NADH allows the transcriptional corepressor carboxyl-terminal binding protein to serve as a metabolic sensor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1633591100
The paper
Fjeld, C. C., Birdsong, W. T., & Goodman, R. H. (2003). Differential binding of NAD + and NADH allows the transcriptional corepressor carboxyl-terminal binding protein to serve as a metabolic sensor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633591100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.