The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR
Open accessAbstract
A method for obtaining strongly polarized nuclear spins in solution has been developed. The method uses low temperature, high magnetic field, and dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) to strongly polarize nuclear spins in the solid state. The solid sample is subsequently dissolved rapidly in a suitable solvent to create a solution of molecules with hyperpolarized nuclear spins. The polarization is performed in a DNP polarizer, consisting of a super-conducting magnet (3.35 T) and a liquid-helium cooled sample space. The sample is irradiated with microwaves at ≈94 GHz. Subsequent to polarization, the sample is dissolved by an injection system inside the DNP magnet. The dissolution process effectively preserves the nuclear polarization. The resulting hyperpolarized liquid sample can be transferred to a high-resolution NMR spectrometer, where an enhanced NMR signal can be acquired, or it may be used as an agent for in vivo imaging or spectroscopy. In this article we describe the use of the method on aqueous solutions of [ 13 C]urea. Polarizations of 37% for 13 C and 7.8% for 15 N, respectively, were obtained after the dissolution. These polarizations correspond to an enhancement of 44,400 for 13 C and 23,500 for 15 N, respectively, compared with thermal equilibrium at 9.4 T and room temperature. The method can be used generally for signal enhancement and reduction of measurement time in liquid-state NMR and opens up for a variety of in vitro and in vivo applications of DNP-enhanced NMR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway
Stincone, A., Prigione, A., Cramer, T., Wamelink, M. M. C., Campbell, K., Cheung, E., Olin‐Sandoval, V., Grüning, N., Krüger, A., Tauqeer Alam, M., et al. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12140 · Cited by 1,576
Glutaminolysis: A Hallmark of Cancer Metabolism
Yang, L., Venneti, S., & Nagrath, D. (2017) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044546 · Cited by 859
Kurhanewicz, J., Vigneron, D. B., Brindle, K., Chekmenev, E. Y., Comment, A., Cunningham, C. H., DeBerardinis, R. J., Green, G. G., Leach, M. O., Rajan, S. S., et al. (2011) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1593/neo.101102 · Cited by 681
Dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity enhancement in modern solid-state NMR
Lilly Thankamony, A. S., Wittmann, J. J., Kaushik, M., & Corzilius, B. (2017) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.06.002 · Cited by 544
Hu, S., Balakrishnan, A., Bok, R. A., Anderton, B., Larson, P. E. Z., Nelson, S. J., Kurhanewicz, J., Vigneron, D. B., & Goga, A. (2011) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.04.012 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Ardenkjær-Larsen, J. H., Fridlund, B., Gram, A., Hansson, G., Hansson, L., Lerche, M. H., Servin, R., Thaning, M., & Golman, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-08-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10158-10163
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2059900570
- Cited by
- 2,861
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1733835100
- The paper
- Ardenkjær-Larsen, J. H., Fridlund, B., Gram, A., Hansson, G., Hansson, L., Lerche, M. H., Servin, R., Thaning, M., & Golman, K. (2003). Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1733835100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.