Cited by 160Ocean Acidification Effects and ResponsesCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Current CaCO 3 dissolution at the seafloor caused by anthropogenic CO 2

Open access
Sulpis, Olivier, Boudreau, Bernard P., Mucci, Alfonso, Jenkins, Chris, Trossman, David S., Arbic, Brian K., Key, Robert M.·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The geological record contains numerous examples of “greenhouse periods” and ocean acidification episodes, where the spreading of corrosive (CO 2 -enriched) bottom waters enhances the dissolution of CaCO 3 minerals delivered to the seafloor or contained within deep-sea sediments. The dissolution of sedimentary CaCO 3 neutralizes excess CO 2 , thus preventing runaway acidification, and acts as a negative-feedback mechanism in regulating atmospheric CO 2 levels over timescales of centuries to millennia. We report an observation-based indication and quantification of significant CaCO 3 dissolution at the seafloor caused by man-made CO 2 . This dissolution is already occurring at various locations in the deep ocean, particularly in the northern Atlantic and near the Southern Ocean, where the bottom waters are young and rich in anthropogenic CO 2 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1804250115

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benthic alkalinity flux from CaCO3 dissolution is expected to increase in the future in response to ocean acidification, in both shallow coastal and deep ocean sediments.

    “Projections of OAE scalability must also consider that benthic alkalinity flux from CaCO3 dissolution is expected to increase in the future in response to ocean acidification, in both shallow coastal and deep ocean sediments. 70-72”

    From A framework for understanding efficiency losses of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (2026) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) says CaCO3 dissolution at the seafloor will intensify over coming decades and centuries, and the paper explains that this process converts CO2 to dissolved bicarbonate. This supports the expected increase in the deep ocean, but the passages do not extend that projection to shallow coastal sediments or explicitly project their benthic alkalinity flux. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [46]Monin AS, Yaglom AM (1971) Statistical Fluid Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), Vols I and II.
  2. [47]Armi L (1977) The dynamics of the bottom boundary layer of the deep ocean. Elsevier Oceanogr Ser 19:153 -164.
  3. [49]Schink D, Guinasso N (1977) Modelling the influence of bioturbation and other processes on calcium carbonate dissolution at the sea floor. The Fate of Fossil Fuel CO2 in the Oceans , eds Andersen NR, Malahoff A (Plenum Press, New York), pp 375 -400.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sulpis, O., Boudreau, B. P., Mucci, A., Jenkins, C., Trossman, D. S., Arbic, B. K., & Key, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Geotop (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
115
Issue
46
Pages
11700-11705
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2898988480
Cited by
160
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-106084, 39679-2013)
  • National Science Foundation (OCE-0960820, PLR-1425989)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
anthropogenic CO2, ocean acidification, calcite compensation depth, deep-sea sediments, dissolution rate, western North Atlantic, deep ocean carbon cycle
MeSH terms
Calcium Carbonate, Carbon Dioxide, Human Activities, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Oceans and Seas, Pacific Ocean, Seawater, Solubility, Water, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review